New food crops
Population growth leads to clearing forests for cities and farms.
Answer this question… Population growth leads to the clearing of forests for cities and farms.
A major burden to the growth of China's economy was cause by the high population growth. An increase in the population has resulted into limited resources among the residents.
The primary cause of urbanization is jobs or the growth of industry. People will move to where they can find work.
The primary cause of global interdependence is the advancement of technology and transportation that has made it easier for countries to trade goods, services, and information across borders. This increased interconnectedness has created a global economy where nations rely on each other for resources, markets, and expertise.
Respiration is part of the carbon cycle and does not affect global warming.
When the population's resources become less available.
The primary cause of mold growth in indoor environments is excess moisture. Mold thrives in damp and humid conditions, making areas with water leaks, high humidity levels, or poor ventilation more susceptible to mold growth.
Africa
The primary cause of the growth in emissions leading to global warming is the increased burning of fossil fuels, such as coal, oil, and natural gas, for energy production and transportation. This combustion releases large quantities of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, which trap heat and contribute to the greenhouse effect. Deforestation and industrial processes also contribute to emissions, exacerbating the problem. As global energy demand rises, so too does the reliance on these carbon-intensive sources, driving further climate change.
This is a somewhat vague question as there are possibly many ways negative population growth can affect the people, if considered in a closed system such as a continent, race, or globally negative population growth will ultimately lead to no people :D If i don't stretch your question i'll assume by "the people" you mean the people in the population. I make this distinction because there are many populations of people apart from each other, for example the population of one city compared to the population of another. A state population, country population, continent, or global population. Perhaps even a race population. But with my prior assumption that "the people" refers to the people in a specific population, i would think that a negative population growth rate would effect it's people in a number of ways, ranging from efforts made to identify the cause of negative population growth to efforts in attending to these causes as to prevent the population from reaching too few in number to sustain itself. I realize this answer is vague, but i think your question needs some reworking if you are looking for a specific answer. Negative population growth in a region that is considered "overpopulated" might positively effect the people, and vice versa in the case where a population is already dwindling to a number that would be considered threatening to the continued existence of a population. If we look at the global population, throughout our history there are examples and obstacles that have lead to the growth of population, and cities and countries are somewhat measured in greatness by their population so in those terms a growing population would be considered healthy or prosperous whereas a negative population growth would be indicative of a country or society that is doing poorly. I think its important to emphasize the population growth rate is a measure of population growth divided by a time period. This is different from an overall population. That being said the effects of a negative population growth rate are somewhat dependent on the overall population at a specific time.
The coreolis effect.