0
It is 'probably true' that all these contracts heavily favored the landowner. He kept the books and could manipulate costs and profits at will. And of course: no profit, no profit share and payment for the sharecropper. Also, it is true that many landowners had a 'company store' that the sharecroppers were obliged to use. So, even if there was a profit share, most or all of it went to the payment of the debt run up at that store.
What else can I help you with?
What would most likely be listed in the contract between a landowner and a sharecropper?
The portion of the crop the landowner owned to the sharecropper
What would most likely be listed in a contract between a landowner in a sharecropper?
The portion of the crop the landowner owed to the sharecropper
What would most likely be listed in a contract between landowners and sharecroppers?
The portion of the crop the landowner owed to the sharecropper
What is the relationship between the landowner and sharecropper?
cdfvv
What would most likely be listed in a contrac between a landowner and a sharecropper?
A contract between a landowner and a sharecropper would typically outline the terms of land use, including the specific crops to be grown and the division of the harvest. It would detail the sharecropper's responsibilities, such as planting, tending, and harvesting the crops, as well as any provisions for tools and supplies provided by the landowner. Additionally, the agreement would specify the share of the profits each party receives and any conditions regarding the duration of the arrangement or termination clauses.
What is the difference between tenant and sharecropper?
A tenant pays rent to a landowner to use the land, while a sharecropper works the land in exchange for a share of the crops produced. Tenants have more independence and control over their farming operations compared to sharecroppers, who typically have less autonomy and may be more financially dependent on the landowner.
Was probably true about contracts between landowners and Sharecroppers?
The land owners took advantage of the sharecroppers leaving them poor and in need.
What is the difference between a sharecropper and a tenant farmer?
A sharecropper is a farmer who works on land owned by someone else and pays for the use of that land by sharing a portion of the crop produced with the landowner, often leading to cycles of debt. In contrast, a tenant farmer also rents land from a landowner but typically pays a fixed cash rent or a specified amount of crops, allowing for more independence in their farming practices. While both arrangements involve working on someone else's land, sharecropping is generally more exploitative and tied to the historical context of post-Civil War America.
What is the true about contracts between landowners and sharecroppers?
Contracts between landowners and sharecroppers typically outline the terms of the arrangement, including the division of labor, the sharing of crops, and any compensation for the sharecropper. These contracts can vary widely and are subject to negotiation, but it's important for both parties to clearly understand and agree to the terms to avoid disputes later on. Landowners often provide land and resources, while sharecroppers provide labor and expertise in cultivation.
What is the difference between a slave and a share cropper?
A slave is a human being owned as property to be used as their owner sees fit. A sharecropper is a tenant farmer who gives a share of the crops raised to the landlord in lieu of rent. The difference is that a slave is not considered a citizen and has no rights. A sharecropper is a citizen, usually with little means, but has the rights of a citizen.
What was a similarity between convict laborers and sharecropper who were in debt?
They had no choice about continuing to work.
What was probably true about contracts between landowners and share croppers?
Landowners typically held more power in the contract negotiations, resulting in terms that were more favorable to them. Sharecroppers often faced unfair treatment, volatile economic conditions, and limited mobility due to debt obligations. Landowners' control over resources and land often kept sharecroppers in a cycle of poverty and dependency.
