horrible
No, poor children did not go to school during Tudor times. During this time period very children went to school or were educated.
fdg
Yes! Of course they do! LUV U ALL!
Life for Tudor children in school was quite different from today. Education was primarily reserved for boys from wealthier families, who learned subjects like Latin, reading, writing, and arithmetic, often under strict discipline. Girls typically received little formal education, focusing instead on domestic skills at home. School days were long and demanding, with a strong emphasis on memorization and religious instruction.
It is not common that tutor children are required to wear a school uniform. Although, most catholic and private school require one.
No, Tudor children did not have school uniforms as we know them today. Children from wealthy families would have worn clothing befitting their social status, while those from poorer families would have worn more practical and simple attire for everyday life.
some did the rich ones did but the poor ones didn't!
Park Tudor School was created in 1902.
Tudor House School was created in 1897.
There was no "margret Tudor".
The motto of Tudor House School is 'Learning for life'.
This answer is an educated guess and not the response of a qualified historian. In the Tudor period, children of the upper classes would not have had to pack a lunch and go to school. They would have been taught at home by tutors and governesses, and only what they needed to know for their station in life. They would have been served meals by servants and would not have been carrying packed lunches to school. Peasant children and children of tradespeople did not go to school but worked on the land or at a trade for their families' well-being. Education of the sort we know had not begun when the Tudor period ended.