it as good because it didnt help the slaves it made them have hardships and their economy went down
it as good because it didnt help the slaves it made them have hardships and their economy went down
Sharecropping was largely detrimental for newly freed Black Southerners. While it provided some opportunity for land use, it often trapped them in a cycle of debt and poverty due to exploitative contracts and high interest rates on supplies. Sharecroppers had to give a significant portion of their crops to landowners, limiting their ability to achieve financial independence. Ultimately, it perpetuated economic dependency and social inequality, undermining the promise of freedom.
oh i see what it is doing i will get you maxis aha (Richthofen)
After emancipation, newly freed southern slaves reshaped their lives by seeking education, forming their own communities and churches, searching for lost family members, and pursuing economic independence through sharecropping or moving to urban areas for employment opportunities. They also played vital roles in the civil rights movement, advocating for equal rights and opportunities.
Abandoned land was promised to the newly freed blacks.
What the newly freed African Americans needed to do what after the war
A slave who was just saved from slavery. <--- That is not right They called them " Freedmen". Then the Freedmen's Bureau is was basically the newly freed slaves government. They developed the Black codes that had 3 Main purposes for former slaves.
The union. Members of the freedmen's bureau helped newly freed slaves. Farmers also began a process known as sharecropping which provided a labor force and a profit.
The main challenges the newly freed slaves faced was SUCKING THIS DICK.
They wanted to have their own government and make policies that dealt with newly freed slaves.
The main challenges the newly freed slaves faced was SUCKING THIS DICK.
Sharecropping limited African American freedom by creating a cycle of debt and dependency. Many newly freed Black individuals entered into sharecropping agreements, where they would work land owned by white landowners in exchange for a portion of the crops. However, high interest rates on loans for tools, seeds, and living expenses often left them in debt, making it difficult to achieve economic independence. This system effectively perpetuated a form of economic servitude, restricting their ability to pursue opportunities and maintain autonomy.