They were occupied by the Germany in World War 2 so it was easier to attack Endland.
The Channel Islands were liberated from German occupation on May 9, 1945. This marked the end of nearly five years of occupation during World War II, as the islands were the only part of the British Isles to be occupied by German forces. The liberation was celebrated by the local population, marking a significant moment in their history.
The channel islands were occupied by Germany.
The Channel Islands were occupied by Germany during WW2.
No, not England, just some British Channel Islands near France.
Sky Pacific will broadcast the 2011 Cricket World Cup in Pacific Islands.
The Channel Islands.
the Channel Islands
The Pacific Islands, particularly the Solomon Islands, the Mariana Islands, and the Aleutian Islands, were the scenes of intense fighting during World War II. Notable battles, such as the Battle of Guadalcanal and the Battle of Iwo Jima, were pivotal in the Pacific Theater. These islands served as strategic locations for both Allied and Japanese forces, leading to significant military engagements and heavy casualties.
No. The only part of the British Isles that was occupied by Germany during the Second World War were the Channel Islands (Jersey, Guernsey, etc), which are near France.
The Channel Islands, south of England were occupied in WW2 and the Germans used them as R&R bases and military hospitals. The Germans built many huge and strong gunposts around the islands to repel British warships.
Here is a list of important islands in the pacific region during World War 2:HawaiiPapua New GuineaChuuk Island State.Solomon Islands
Yes, they invaded and occupied the channel islands. ----- Actually, no. They did invade the channel islands, but the channel islands are not part of England or even of the UK. They are a crown dependency. They are remnants of the old Duchy of Normandy, which never reverted to France, and are separate. It is for this reason that one of the titles of Queen Elizabeth II is Duke of Normandy (note: properly "duke," not "duchess," in this case).