Want this question answered?
It was not until 1514 that, bartolome de las casas had a complete change of heart and reversed his stance on slavery and also the entire topic of Spanish mistreatment of Native Americans.
Jefferson Davis said: " The condition of slavery with us is, in a word, Mr. President, nothing but the form of civil government instituted for a class of people not fit to govern themselves. It is exactly what in every State exists in some form or other. It is just that kind of control which is extended in every northern State over its convicts, its lunatics, its minors, its apprentices. It is but a form of civil government for those who by their nature are not fit to govern themselves. We recognize the fact of the inferiority stamped upon that race of men by the Creator, and from the cradle to the grave, our Government, as a civil institution, marks that inferiority." - He said this in the Senate Chamber of the U.S. Capitol on February 29, 1860. Jefferson Davis was a staunch believer in states' rights. It was his interpretation of the constitution, his belief that the United States was a voluntary union of sovereign states, that actually led him to become the president of the confederacy. In the years leading up to Mississippi's break with the union, the northern states and the federal government were submitting the southern states to abnormal pressure. Basically, the federal government saw the southern states as captive consumers of the northern factories. When the southern states looked overseas for trade, the northern companies through their congressional influence imposed biased tax laws upon the southern consumers. Finally, the south said "we've had enough". The south sent a represetative body to Washington, seeking an audience to discuss peaceful resolutions, but President Lincoln refused to see them. The south did not declare, nor did they fight, a civil war. By definition, in simple terms, a civil conflict is where one party tries to overthrow the government of another party. The southern confederacy did not try to overthrow the US federal government. the southern states simply wanted to be left alone, to pursue a government that they thought was more just. Rather than look for a peaceful resolution, the federal government knew that the confederate states produced over 75% of the agicultural products of the United States. The federal government did not want to relinguish control over that much prosperity. How does this relate to Jefferson Davis' view of slavery? Simple. Slavery was part of the economic condition in the south. Davis viewed slaves as property and defended his stance by citing the constitution. But Davis also knew the obvious immoral problem of slavery. He was, as was most of the southern plantation owners, struggling with the solution. But the immediate problem with the formation of the confederacy and the position that the federal government took when it came to heavy-handed governing, caused his public position on slavery to take a back seat. Davis was in favor of reviving the slave trade and dreamed of a slave-holding empire that included Cuba, Mexico, and farther south. He also showed no interest in territories that did not allow slavery. During the Civil War, he was careful to avoid the appearance of being pro-slavery because he hoped that England, Russia, or France would assist the Confederacy. England and Russia were firmly against slavery and France would not get involved alone. In one of his speeches, Davis is credited with telling either the US congress or the congress of the confederacy (I can't find the document and I don't remember which speech) that slavery would disappear from this country within two more generations, perhaps sooner. Some of the biggest benefactors of slavery were the owners of shipping lines residing in the northern states. So don't be too quick to judge the South. Slavery was, and is, an appalling practice that scarred the lives of so many. The world has evolved in many ways, and many of the practices in the history of our planet were barbarious. It is not difficult to understand that our part of the world had to go through the same evolutionary changes. Hopefully we have learned from our past. Comment: I find it quite ironic that the username of the person who wrote this answer is "FactChecker1" but there isn't a single citation.
Jefferson was viewed as a plantation and slave owner, and his anti-national stance guaranteed their local rights to do what they wanted without federal oversight of their actions.
They passed resolutions that favored both negotiations and a tough stance against the British government.
Those Americans were against Texas becoming independent from U.S since they didnt want to become part of the U.S.
Breckinridge's stance on the issue of slavery differed from Lincoln's because Lincoln opposed the expansion of slavery into the territories and Breckinridge insisted that the government be required to protect slavery in any territory.
the free soil party's stance on slavery was the buying and selling of slaves
In his inaugural address, Lincoln promised not to interfere with the institution of slavery where it existed, and pledged to suspend the activities of the federal government temporarily in areas of hostility. However, he also took a firm stance against secession and the seizure of federal property.
One way in which Lincoln attempted to reassure the South about his stance on slavery was by telling the South he had no intention to interfere with slavery where it already existed. The American Civil War was fought from 1861 to 1865.
i...have no idea
The Republicans opposed the extension of slavery , but they did not propose abolishing it where it already existed.
africa
Tennessee seceded from the Union in 1861 primarily due to its strong affiliation with the Southern economy, culture, and institution of slavery. Many Tennesseans believed in and were committed to the idea of states' rights, which they felt were being threatened by the federal government. The decision to secede was also influenced by the election of President Abraham Lincoln, whose anti-slavery stance was perceived as a threat to the Southern way of life.
They opposed the Kansas-Nebraska Act because they were against the expansion of slavery into new states.
They opposed the Kansas-Nebraska Act because they were against the expansion of slavery into new states.
Senator Shelby does not support the repeal of DOMA.
Senator McCain is opposed to gay marriage.