Nobles and knights did not own land, they simply held it from the king (who owned every square inch). A knight might hold as many as seven or eight manors in different parts of the country, each including one or more villages or parts of villages. The total land held in this way was called an "honour" (Anglo-Norman French honur, feudal domain, property and rights).
Since a nobleman could not (and would not) work all this land himself, he allowed his tenant farming peasants to hold sections of it, in return for rents, customary dues and work obligations. The king still owned all of it, but it was occupied and worked by these farming peasants.
A tenant-in-chief or baron.
No. They were given unguarenteed useless pieces of paper called continentals.
A peasant sometimes freeman.
Yes they did, they would be given land by a higher authority as payment or reward for their services.
The people who owned the land were the Nobility and the Nobility were charged with protection of the country and king. So they were required to serve as a knight for the king to keep the land they were given.
The agreement you are referring to is called "subinfeudation."
The land and/or priviledges that were given to you.
the Medieval Knight did not earn money. In return for his services to the lord or king, the knight would be payed by gaining land.
Knights were wealthy in their own right because they were nobles. To own a horse and armor required money. Often for services they were given land, power positions, or married women with lands and connections.
A knight may receive land, wealth, titles, and honor in return for their services. They could also gain opportunities for advancement, social status, and the chance to participate in tournaments and ceremonies.
Pieces of land given to knights as payment were called fiefs.
No. They were given unguarenteed useless pieces of paper called continentals.
A peasant sometimes freeman.
Yes they did, they would be given land by a higher authority as payment or reward for their services.
The people who owned the land were the Nobility and the Nobility were charged with protection of the country and king. So they were required to serve as a knight for the king to keep the land they were given.
...a Fief.
Mexican Cession
1st answer: no 2nd answer: Yes they did. a Knight was most often given a fief of land to rule on behalf of his immediate superior. These fiefs would normally include a manor of some description in which a knight could rule close to his subjects, however he'll usually be given an apartment in his lords castle or town.