In the related links box below, I posted the information.
Japan lost the means to feed the people or rebuild Japan.
In terms of casualties - 90,000-166,000 people in Hiroshima and 60,000-80,000 in Nagasaki.
In terms of casualties, The estimate was: 90,000-166,000 people in Hiroshima and 60,000-80,000 in Nagasaki.
Hiroshima was A-bombed on 06 August 45. August 15th is when Japan accepted surrender terms.
In what terms? Money? Casualty? Damage? If we are looking at aftermath, than it is priceless
The atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a very significant event in human history. Politically, it meant that Imperial Japan was finished and had no choice but to surrender, which it did. It also ushered in the nuclear age, and nuclear weapons have been the most important factor in international politics ever since that time. In economic terms, it meant that a lot of money was going to be spent by various nations in order to build nuclear weapons. A major defense industry was thereby created. There are many other consequences as well, too many to mention. Large events have many consequences, and the consequences have their own consequences, in an ever expanding sequence that propagates forever.
The atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Yes. The Empire of Japan was preparing to surrender in the summer of 1945 under the condition their Emperor could retain his office. The terms accepted after the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were almost identical to those prior.
In human terms, possibly yes. In bear terms, no.
Bombing them into submission. Making them accept our terms. Making them want to negotiate.
what terms do scientist talk about volcano
in terms of shear size, the japanese battleships yamato and musashi were that biggest weapons, in terms of destructive power the atomic bombs dropped and hiroshima and nagasaki take the cake