ether or not slaves could be considered citizens
Dred Scott v. Sanford
Dred Scott v. Sanford
Which statement best describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?
The plaintiff in the Dred Scott v. Sanford case was Dred Scott, a slave who had lived in free states with his master and believed he should be granted freedom as a result. Ultimately, the Supreme Court ruled against him, denying his right to freedom and further inflaming tensions between the North and South over the issue of slavery.
Dred Scott was found guilty in the Dred Scott v. Sanford case. This caused the African Americans to not be allowed to fight for freedom in court.
The finding in the Dred Scott vs Sanford case was tha when a slave master took a slave tho the north, the slave was notautomaticaly freed and furthermore that slaves were not people, but property.
The Supreme Court met in Washington, D.C. when it decided the Dred Scott case. It has met in Washington for every case since February 1801.
No, it could not apply today, because the case was concerned with the rights of slaves.
Dred Scott v. Sanford
The Supreme Court case Dred Scott v. Sanford did not decide if Dred Scott was a slave or not, but that slaves (and their descendants) could not be counted as US citizens and had no right to sue in court.
Dred Scott v. Sanford, 60 US 393 (1857)The court case was Dred Scott v. Sandford, in 1857.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Dred Scott, Plaintiff in Error v. John F. A. Sandford, 60 US 393 (1857)The short title is Scott v. Sandford, but the case is often referred to colloquially as "the Dred Scott case." Sandford is misspelled in the Supreme Court documents; the proper spelling is Sanford, without a d. This cannot be corrected, however.