Want this question answered?
During the period of the monarchy red as the colour of the kings. During the period of rule by emperors purple was the colour of the emperors.
During the period of of the monarchy the senators were appointed by the king. During the period of the Republic they were enrolled by the censors on the basis of wealth and suitability of character. During the period of rule by emperors they were appointed by the emperor.
The magistrates were the officers of state. During the period of the Roman Republic the two consuls were the heads of the republic. During the period of rule by emperors the emperors were absolute rulers and the consulship retained high status, but had no political significance. During this period the prefects were the most important magistrates.
During the 244-year period of the monarchy the king run the government. During the 482-year period of the Roman Republic two annually elected consuls were in charge and they were either patricians (aristocrats) or rich plebeians (commoners). During the 503-year period of rule by emperors, the emperors were absolute rulers.
There was no period of bad emperors as such. The term "five good emperors" is a historical tag given to the five emperors from Nerva to Marcus Aurelius because there was no great political crises during their reigns and the empire ran smoothly. A far as "bad emperors" went, you could say that every emperor had his negative points even Augustus -- some more than others.
During the period of the monarchy red as the colour of the kings. During the period of rule by emperors purple was the colour of the emperors.
The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.The Pax Romana was a period of loosely 2oo years and Rome was led by the emperors during this time. They ranged from Augustus to the last of the five good emperors.
During the period of the monarchy (753-509 B.C.) the rulers were the kings. During the period of the Republic (509-27 B.C.) the consuls were the two annually elected heads of the Republic. During the period of rule by emperors (27 B.C.-509 A.D.) the rules were the emperors.
During the 244-year period of the monarchy the kings were chosen by the senate and elected by the people. During the 482-year period of the republic the consuls, the two heads of the republic, were elected annually by the Assembly of the Soldiers. During the 506-year period of rule by emperors the emperors chose their heir.
The Romans had three forms of government over the 1,200 years f their history: a monarchy for 244 years, a republic for 482 years and rule by emperors for 53 years. During the monarchy the king was in charge. During the republican period two annually elected consuls were the heads of the Republic. During the period of rule by emperors, the emperors were in charge.
During the 244-year period of the monarchy it was the king, during the 482-year period of the republic it was the aristocracy, during the 503-year period of rule by emperors it was the emperor.
During the period of of the monarchy the senators were appointed by the king. During the period of the Republic they were enrolled by the censors on the basis of wealth and suitability of character. During the period of rule by emperors they were appointed by the emperor.
During the 244-year period of the monarchy the candidate for the kingship was chosen by the senate and he was elected by the people. During the 482-year period of the republic the heads of the republic were two consuls who were elected annually by the Assembly of the Soldiers. During the 506-year period of rule by emperors the emperors where absolute rulers and they chose their heir.
The magistrates were the officers of state. During the period of the Roman Republic the two consuls were the heads of the republic. During the period of rule by emperors the emperors were absolute rulers and the consulship retained high status, but had no political significance. During this period the prefects were the most important magistrates.
During the 244-year period of the monarchy the king run the government. During the 482-year period of the Roman Republic two annually elected consuls were in charge and they were either patricians (aristocrats) or rich plebeians (commoners). During the 503-year period of rule by emperors, the emperors were absolute rulers.
No
There was no period of bad emperors as such. The term "five good emperors" is a historical tag given to the five emperors from Nerva to Marcus Aurelius because there was no great political crises during their reigns and the empire ran smoothly. A far as "bad emperors" went, you could say that every emperor had his negative points even Augustus -- some more than others.