During the 244-year period of the monarchy the king run the government. During the 482-year period of the Roman Republic two annually elected consuls were in charge and they were either patricians (aristocrats) or rich plebeians (commoners). During the 503-year period of rule by emperors, the emperors were absolute rulers.
Men of any social class were eligible to become government officials.
The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.
The upper class men had races, tournaments( including knights, and squires), and peasants would put on a show for the lords and the upper class men.
During the Elizabethan era the majority of marriages were arranged. Men would look for women who were in their social class or above, who had a good reputation and a large dowry.
Life for men in the 1700s varied significantly based on social class and region. In Europe, many men were engaged in agriculture or trades, while those in urban areas often worked in emerging industries or served in the military. Social hierarchies defined their roles, with wealthier men holding power in politics and society, while lower-class men faced hard labor and limited opportunities. Additionally, the Enlightenment sparked new ideas about individual rights, which began to influence men's roles in society and governance.
Men of any social class were eligible to become government officials.
A business man in ancient Rome was a "negotiator". As a class, many of the business men were wealthy enough to be Equites.A business man in ancient Rome was a "negotiator". As a class, many of the business men were wealthy enough to be Equites.A business man in ancient Rome was a "negotiator". As a class, many of the business men were wealthy enough to be Equites.A business man in ancient Rome was a "negotiator". As a class, many of the business men were wealthy enough to be Equites.A business man in ancient Rome was a "negotiator". As a class, many of the business men were wealthy enough to be Equites.A business man in ancient Rome was a "negotiator". As a class, many of the business men were wealthy enough to be Equites.A business man in ancient Rome was a "negotiator". As a class, many of the business men were wealthy enough to be Equites.A business man in ancient Rome was a "negotiator". As a class, many of the business men were wealthy enough to be Equites.A business man in ancient Rome was a "negotiator". As a class, many of the business men were wealthy enough to be Equites.
men and woman in social class learned how to socialize? think mcfly! i mean, how obvious is that! come on!
The equites or members of the equestrian order, were a social class in ancient Rome. Originally they were the men wealthy enough to own a horse and were the cavalry. However over time, they grew into a separate social class consisting of businessmen, merchants, and magistrates. They wore a gold ring as a sign of their status. You could loosely call them the middle class.
No. Rome is the capital of Italy and Italy has a democratically elected government with a prime minister and president.No. Rome is the capital of Italy and Italy has a democratically elected government with a prime minister and president.No. Rome is the capital of Italy and Italy has a democratically elected government with a prime minister and president.No. Rome is the capital of Italy and Italy has a democratically elected government with a prime minister and president.No. Rome is the capital of Italy and Italy has a democratically elected government with a prime minister and president.No. Rome is the capital of Italy and Italy has a democratically elected government with a prime minister and president.No. Rome is the capital of Italy and Italy has a democratically elected government with a prime minister and president.No. Rome is the capital of Italy and Italy has a democratically elected government with a prime minister and president.No. Rome is the capital of Italy and Italy has a democratically elected government with a prime minister and president.
The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.
The highest social class in the second century BCE was known as the Senatorial Class. It included all men who served as senators and also their families.
Egyptian men did what most men of any society did at that time: they worked. Of course, their job depended upon their social class. Like the low social classes would farm or build the pyramids when it was not farming season. The middle class men may have done things like own shops, and things like that. The higher class men may have done things involved with government or with priests, things like that, which were going to be a lot less hard than the lower class. In other words, the lower class men had the harder, more laborious jobs, and they had to really work; the middle class men also worked, but maybe not so hard and with such laborious tasks as the lower class; and the higher class had the not-so-hard jobs, at least not as hard physically.
The upper class men had races, tournaments( including knights, and squires), and peasants would put on a show for the lords and the upper class men.
the consules were the top of the government both men has to agree. Elected for one year
There were revolts and battles between powerful men for control of the government
There is no evidence of any social class. But some records show men had meetings in underground rooms to discuss problems.