Enough evidence that it was you that committed the offense.
It refers to using the evidence available to 'reconstruct,' insofar as possible, what happened during the offense.
circumstantial evidence is usually a theory, an example is the behavior of a person around the time of an alleged offense
Generally, when there is a warrant for your arrest, when the officer has seen you commit an arrestable offense, or when there are witnesses or other evidence that you have committed an arrestable offense.
Yes, just like police: if, while looking for evidence of one offense, it is discovered that another offense has been committed, then the teacher can act on that offense.
Yes.
Anyone involved in a criminal offense can be charged with giving false testimony or falsifying evidence.
If photos were taken eight months prior to the tenant moving in and the landlord is using this as evidence of that tenant's damages then he is NOT committing an offense of Contempt of Court: he is committing the offense of PERJURY, or lying to court and creating false evidence, which is even more serious.
You mean TAINTED evidence. Tainted evidence is evidentiary material that has been collected in a manner or by a method which makes it inadmissible in court, and therefore, cannot be used in the prosecution of the offense.
Not lawfully. Evidence of a crime points to the possible perpetrator. By tampering with it, you throw the investigation off-track, you can be charged with a criminal offense such as "Obstructing Justice."
Taking the initial report of the offense - gathering of evidence - investigation of the offense - identification of the possible suspect(s) - apprehension of the perpetrator(s) - presentation of the defendant and evidence to the prosecutor.
Yes, absolutely. The investigation into the offense may well still be continuing and additional evidence uncovered. As long as the defense is advised of this evidence during 'discovery' it is perfectly admissible.