It was not some "pipe dream" that there was a real chance for France and England to intervene in the US Civil War. Whether by recognizing the Confederacy as an independent nation, and/or mitigating a peace settlement. Here are some insights to what would have dramatically changed the results of the US Civil War:
1. The British government was going to begin activity concerning its possible intervention shortly after Lee crossing the Potomac River;
2. There was also the " Trent Affair" in which a US warship stopped a British ship carrying Confederate diplomats and taking them into custody. Britain demanded an apology and a wise President Lincoln did so, thereby ending British threats to use force to prevent any further such incidents; and
3. Based on a false report that McClellan's army in the Peninsula Campaign had been defeated totally, the British Cabinet was beginning to see a prospect for recognizing the South.
Indian intervention in the Sri Lankan Civil War happened in 1987.
More than one historian has put forth the idea that when the Union lost the Second Battle of Bull Run, that European intervention was at a high peak of intervention. They argue that if Confederate General had not invaded Maryland but instead consolidated its forces, Great Britain and France may well have determined that it was time for intervention in the US Civil War. The hope of the Confederacy was, of course a proposal by Great Britain for intervention and soon formal recognition of the Confederacy.
There wasn't a civil war in 1735 in any of the major European countries or among the colonies.
The US had a non intervention policy before December 1941 and saw the war as a 'European War' and nothing to do with America.
The Italian Second Independence War fought in 1859 between France and Reign of Piemonte against the Austrian Empire. But, the war that the American Civil War is most often compared to is the Crimean War.
Indian intervention in the Sri Lankan Civil War happened in 1987.
The Battle of Antietam played a part in reducing the threat of European intervention on behalf of the Confederacy and gave Lincoln the victory he needed to proceed with the proclamations publication.
More than one historian has put forth the idea that when the Union lost the Second Battle of Bull Run, that European intervention was at a high peak of intervention. They argue that if Confederate General had not invaded Maryland but instead consolidated its forces, Great Britain and France may well have determined that it was time for intervention in the US Civil War. The hope of the Confederacy was, of course a proposal by Great Britain for intervention and soon formal recognition of the Confederacy.
No
Richard Little has written: 'Intervention' -- subject(s): Intervention (International law), Civil war
The Spanish Civil War was in the late 1930's
There wasn't a civil war in 1735 in any of the major European countries or among the colonies.
SpainAlthough it was a civil war, Germany, Italy, AND Soviet Russia had joined in. (Extended by Melodius92)
The Spanish Civil War (1936-39)
Russia supported the Union during the US Civil War.
LOL Harrison
Intervention from britiain and france.