The oldest recorded organism that had photosensitive sensory organs with the ability to detect the presence and direction of light within a few degrees of accuracy was a prehistoric sea snail that existed approximately 550 million years ago. Organisms that could detect the presence but not the direction of light probably evolved earlier, but no fossils of these organisms have been found.
you can tell if this "thing'' if it can move, or it needs to survive by food , and if it can grow, it takes amounts of investigation to see if this"thing" is a living thing.
You can touch it and see whether it responds to your touch maybe by moving away.
NO, because water does not breathe, feel, see or have any similar characteristics to a living thing such as a human or plant. So water is not a living thing, but currently every known living thing needs water to survive.
NO, because water does not breathe, feel, see or have any similar characteristics to a living thing such as a human or plant. So water is not a living thing, but currently every known living thing needs water to survive.
No. While pretty much any living thing you can see without a microscope is multicellular, most living things are actually unicellular.
The answer for sure is not Robert Hooke. He did see cells but they were NOT LIVING!
God
You do not have the right to see it, but she could show it to you if she wants to.
You can touch it and see whether it responds to your touch maybe by moving away.
Bacterium is an example.
Well the first and truly thing to go up to space was a monkey, to see uf it was safe and if it could reach back down to earth!
No, a rainbow is not a living thing. In fact, it's not even a thing. A rainbow is the result of sunlight reflecting from the insides of droplets of rainwater. It's as real a thing as the picture of yourself that you see in a mirror, and no two people even see the same rainbow in the same place at the same time.