During the 1930's, African Americans almost always received the short end of the stick when in came to legal recourse. In cases such as assualt, if the victim was African Amercan and the criminal white, judges would almost always overlook all evidence or the lack there of. In other situations where the African American was the accused, court systems generally favored the whites.
Another View: Except for the so-called "Jim Crow" laws which existed in some Southern states, the law was the same for ALL Americans. There was no separate "legal system" for Blacks - it was in the way that the law was ADMINISTERED that was the subject of inequality.
In the 1930s, the jury system in the United States was similar to the system in place today. Juries were composed of a group of ordinary citizens who were tasked with listening to evidence presented in court and reaching a verdict based on that evidence. The right to a trial by jury was a fundamental part of the American justice system during this time.
Google.com
google.com
During the Enlightenment, there was a shift towards more rational and humane approaches to the justice system. Ideas such as the rule of law, due process, and the rights of the accused gained prominence. Legal reforms aimed to ensure fairness, equality, and the protection of individual rights within the justice system.
Justice Hugo Black actually served from 1937 until 1971, the 1930s to the 1970s. President Franklin D. Roosevelt appointed Black to succeed Justice Willis Van Devanter, who retired in 1937.
how much does fruit cost in the 1930s?
Yes.
During the 1930s internationalists wanted the US to take a more active role in world affairs.
It did not influenced the justice system. The legal code that influenced the justice system was "Justinian's code"
the 1930s
they had farming
during the 1930s to the 1940s