Want this question answered?
Plessy v. Furguson
The Fourteenth Amendment gave him the right to equal treatment on a train.
Making Plessy change his seat violated his equal rights under the constitution
Plessy's Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated.(ALS)
The Supreme Court decided that Plessy's plan was still treating the negro as if they were being segerated.
In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, Plessy's legal team argued that Louisiana's Separate Car Act, which required racial segregation on trains, violated the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. They contended that the law denied Plessy equal protection under the law, as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. However, the Supreme Court rejected this argument and upheld the constitutionality of "separate but equal" racial segregation.
Plessy v. Ferguson
making plessy change his seat violated his equal rights under the constitution-apex
Plessy v. Ferguson was a landmark 1896 US Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the "separate but equal" doctrine. It legitimized the move in America toward segregation and provided an impetus for pro-segregation legislation (also called Jim Crow laws) across the country.Case Citation:Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896)
Plessy's Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated.(ALS)
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896),
That would be the Supreme Court Case Plessy vs. Furgeson