They were one of the first to use sit-ins as a form of political resistance
The suffragettes were the violent campaigners.
to use nonviolent protests
Gandhiji freed India from the British Rule through his nonviolent and non-cooperative methods.
While there were societies and associationsof suffragettes, suffragettes were simply women who actively supported granting women the vote. To join was simply to do.
the year the suffragettes saw that there aim was acjieved was 1912 the year the suffragettes saw that there aim was acjieved was 1912
Jesus Mahatma Gandhi : Suffragettes
they influenced chavez to use nonviolent methods such as a hunger strike
violent protest is like the suffragettes they used violence to get what they wanted and nonviolent is where you use powers of persuasion to get your way and not to use violence.
Suffragettes and suffragists both aimed to achieve women's suffrage, but their methods differed. Suffragettes were more militant and used confrontational tactics like protests and civil disobedience, while suffragists worked within the system, advocating for change through peaceful means like lobbying and public education campaigns.
They used nonviolent methods of civil disobedience.
that direct, nonviolent methods could gain civil rights for African Americans.
no
they influenced chavez to use nonviolent methods such as a hunger strike
SNCC
He had studied Gandhi and realized that more can get done through nonviolence rather than violence.
Protest for civil rights with nonviolent methods ~ Apex
You can use the word "nonviolent" as an adjective that describes a noun such as, "The nonviolent boy argued with words, not fists," where the adjective "nonviolent" describes the noun "boy."