violent protest is like the suffragettes they used violence to get what they wanted
and nonviolent is where you use powers of persuasion to get your way and not to use violence.
Violent protests involve the use of force or aggression, while nonviolent protests rely on peaceful means such as civil disobedience and peaceful demonstrations. Research suggests that nonviolent protests are often more effective in bringing about lasting social change, as they are more likely to garner public support, avoid backlash, and create a sense of unity among participants. In contrast, violent protests can lead to negative consequences such as increased repression and alienation from potential allies.
None violent is when you just said something to offend a person and violent is when you hurt or atttack to a person
Resisting oppressive rule can take both violent and nonviolent forms, each with distinct implications. Nonviolent action, such as protests, civil disobedience, and grassroots organizing, seeks to undermine the legitimacy of oppressive regimes while fostering solidarity and awareness among the populace. In contrast, violent resistance might involve armed struggle or sabotage, aiming to directly confront and dismantle oppressive structures. Ultimately, the choice between these methods depends on the specific context, goals, and values of the movement.
No, they were completely non violent.
Nonviolent protests were successful primarily because they garnered widespread public support and sympathy, highlighting social injustices without resorting to violence. This approach often drew attention from the media, helping to amplify the protesters' messages and sway public opinion. Additionally, nonviolent tactics fostered a moral high ground, making it difficult for authorities to justify violent repression. By maintaining discipline and unity, these movements were able to sustain momentum and create lasting change.
Mount St Helens is violent.
An example of a nonviolent unsuccessful method is the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests in China. Despite the peaceful demonstrations advocating for democratic reforms and greater freedoms, the movement was met with a violent crackdown by the government. The protesters' calls for change were ultimately suppressed, and the government maintained its authoritarian control, highlighting the limitations of nonviolent resistance in the face of state violence.
the teddybear was non violent
Iran in 1979
dorothy the dinosaur
Up until the 20th century, violent revolutions were definitly heavily used. However, after media became more wide spread, non-violent revolution became more effective, and usually the more preferred solution. Protests, petitions, and other forms of civil resistance are now more used in most countries.
Nonviolent resistance (apex)