It depends on the Photograph the person is in...
I hope this helps. :)
Paedophile!
well the first person to take a photograph in the victorian times was..... I dont know lol xx
The person who took the photograph generally owns the rights to it, unless there is a specific agreement stating otherwise.
Photograph reading, also known as psychometry, is the practice of using a photograph to access information about a person, object, or event by holding or concentrating on the photograph. Practitioners believe that they can pick up on energy or vibrations from the photograph to gain insights or impressions. It is a form of divination or psychic reading.
You can photograph people in public without their permission for any reason you want.
Anyone may photograph anything that is in plain sight from a point where the person has a legal right to be.
a random person
A cow!
the corenor how ever its spelled
Its not actually a photograph, it was copied from a painting a person made.
Representational photography is the photograph of a certain subject as a representation of another. For example, you may photograph a favorite video game or musical album of a person to represent them.
I believe that a photograph is unethical when it misrepresents a business, a person or a belief intentionally. If a photograph causes emotional strain or stress to someone grieving the loss of a loved one, even a pet, I believe that it is unethical to post it. If a photograph promotes racial, religious, gender or sexual bias, it is unethical.