Tom couldn't have done it because Mr. Heck Tate said her injuries were to her right side, which would have meant that the person would of had to of been left handed. And Tom's left hand is mutilated from a cotton picking accident. Atticus had Mr. Bob Ewell sign his name and he signed it with his left hand. So, Mr. Bob Ewell had to of done it.
There is evidence linking Tom's fingerprints to the scene of the crime and eyewitnesses who place him at the location during the time of the incident. Additionally, security camera footage may show Tom engaging in suspicious behavior or committing the crime.DNA evidence connecting Tom to the crime can also be persuasive in proving guilt.
I have not read the book yet, but in the movie it was an injury to his hand which made him incapable of committing the crime.
No he was not proven innocent. He was proven guilty. His story made sense in so many ways but since he was black people decided he should be guilty.
jkjiooo
Tom Robinson is found guilty by the all-white jury, despite strong evidence proving his innocence. The racial prejudice of the jury members leads to an unjust verdict.
Not guilty, Jem has been following the case intently and knows the rational verdict would be guilty as there is reasonable doubt about Tom Robinson perpetrating the crime
If the prosecutors have exculpatory evidence they must turn it over to the defense. Exculpatory evidence is evidence that shows that the defendant is not guilty or would help in his defense, A motion for exculpatory evidence is a defense motion asking the judge to order the prosecutors to turn such evidence over to the defense.
Tom Robinson was found guilty in Chapter 21 of Harper Lee's novel "To Kill a Mockingbird".
not to feel guilty and to find evidence to prove you are guilty
Yes, if the defendant says and shows he/she is guilty.
No, but the jury in the courtroom couldn't let a black person be innocent in front of a white person even if all the evidence points the other way.
In "To Kill a Mockingbird," Atticus Finch's defense of Tom Robinson to the jury might be considered a counterclaim to the prosecution's argument that Tom is guilty of assaulting Mayella Ewell. Atticus argues that the evidence points to Tom's innocence and that racial prejudice is clouding the judgment of the jury.
Juvenile judge find me guilty no evidence just one the victim Asia but the victim witness said he wasn't me
Jem predicts that Atticus and Tom will win the case and Tom will be found not guilty because of the evidence that proves he is innocent
Circumstantial evidence is evidence that indirectly suggests someone's guilt, as opposed to direct evidence like eyewitness testimony. In Tom's case, circumstantial evidence such as his fingerprints on the murder weapon and his presence at the crime scene led to his conviction, even though there was no direct proof that he committed the crime.
The attorney's evidence prooved the suspect guilty of the crime.