Religious people believe that such a possibility is ridiculous. We see humans as being the result of creation by God.
Yes
there is no result of anything bad but also there is not an effect on humans on grass lands.
Humans don't cause cyclones. They are a natural event. There have been proposals that global warming as a result of human greenhouse emissions would increase the frequency or intensity of cyclone, but that still wouldn't mean humans are directly causing cyclones.
This might be genetics. It sees that everything that humans do is related the biology that is going on inside of them.
Religious people believe that such a possibility is ridiculous. We see humans as being the result of creation by God.
Melanin.
Melanin.
Nonfunctional zygote
Plants that provide food for humans as a result of photosynthesis are called autotrophs. They are the primary producers in the food chain.
Yes
B.did not result in a Japanese surrender.
Humans are not a normal part of any shark's diet. There are only about 60 shark attacks on humans worldwide per year, few of which result in death.
Although aliments are necessary for humans, they can also result in many diseases.
Humans and monkeys
How do you determine what it right? If polling answers.com is your method, then certainly "NO" will be your answer. I suspect that consulting your conscience will yield the same result.
rain is the most important result of watercycle....... without rain there are no crops........ no crops no food...... no food......no humans