Candragupt, Candra Gupta, LOL thats all i know of the top of my head :}
It was in fact, a rajah. *glowers at the person who put gobble gobble gobble head*
one of the rulers were candragupta mauryan 2.asoka 3.candra gupta 1 4.candra gupta 2
The British in the 1700s
The British in the 1700sthe british in the 1700s
The states which were under the direct control of British were regarded to be a part of British India. The states which were under indirect control of British but were actually controlled by dynastic rulers were the princely states. The British were taking annual pension from the rulers and were also using their army.
For American Indians 'Chiefs' For Indians from India 'Shahs, 'Maharajahs, 'Mughal emperors', 'Rajahs'.
as the developments which took place during this period were tremendous. the rulers have brought a new look to india
No, India does not have a monarch. The rulers are elected.
British were the rulers. ALL INDIA WAR MEMORIAL-India gate . The foundation stone of the memorial was laid by visiting Duke of Connaught in 10 Feb, 1921
The Mughal rulers were different from earlier Muslim rulers of India because most of the people who ruled were Hindu's. Eventually a ruler Akbar persuaded Hindus an Muslims to live more peacefully together. ~I hope that helped you!:)
britishers- of course
by the different rulers
They has to pray
The British in the 1700s
brad gerhing
by the different rulers
if the rulers are good and have the thought to help people then they will try or rulers will complete their right wishes and if rulers are bad they will not complete people wishes or they will complete by taking bribe from people
They used a gun
India experienced unprecedented economic and social growth during the reign of Mughal Dynasty. Mughal rulers enforced efficient laws and taxation system and upheld peace through brinkmanship of successive able rulers like Akbar, Jahangir and Aurangzeb.