Klopfer won, no one voted against him
The parties involved in Klopfer v. North Carolina were the petitioner, David Klopfer, and the respondent, the State of North Carolina. The case centered around the issue of whether a defendant's right to a speedy trial was violated under the Sixth Amendment. Klopfer argued that the delay in his trial constituted a breach of his constitutional rights. Ultimately, the Supreme Court ruled that the right to a speedy trial is applicable to state courts through the Fourteenth Amendment.
No, its a different state, governed by different laws.
Significance: state sovereignty
Significance: state sovereignty
Significance: state sovereignty
Significance: state sovereignty
Significance: state sovereignty
Significance: state sovereignty
· Burlington, North Carolina · Cary, North Carolina · Durham, North Carolina · High Point, North Carolina · Kitty Hawk, North Carolina · Morgantown, North Carolina · Oxford, North Carolina · Salisbury, North Carolina · Wilmington, North Carolina
North Carolina is north of South Carolina
That's the decision of the executor of the estate.
North Carolina.