0
United States v. Nixon, 418 US 683 (1974)
The court of original jurisdiction in this case was US District Court for the District of Columbia, presided over by Judge John Sirica.
The Judge approved Special Prosecutor Leon Jaworski's subpoena on the grounds that neither Executive Privilege nor Separation of Powers between the branches of government were sufficient to abrogate the six accused conspirators' constitutional rights under the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause and the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause. Nixon was ordered to give Jaworski the tapes.
Nixon appealed the decision directly to the US Supreme Court, bypassing the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, so there was no intermediate appellate ruling in this case. The Supreme Court ultimately affirmed Sirica's ruling.
(Sirica was Time Magazine's Man of the Year in 1973)
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What was the Supreme Court's ruling in the US V's Nixon case of 1974?
The president cannot use executive privilege in order to withhold evidence from a criminal trial.
What was the supreme courts ruling in the US v. Nixon case of 1974?
The president cannot use executive privilege in order to withhold evidence from a criminal trial.
What was the Supreme Court ruling the US v Nixon case of 1974?
The president cannot use executive privilege in order to withhold evidence from a criminal trial.
What was the Supreme Court's ruling in the US v. Nixon case of 1974?
Nixon v. United States is not related to the case involving former President Richard Nixon.The Nixon v. US, (1993) ruling listed in United States Reports (the official volumes containing US Supreme Court opinions) is Nixon v. United States, 506 US 224 (1993). This case is not related to former President Nixon, but to an impeached Mississippi US District Court judge, Walter Nixon, who appealed the Senate's impeachment ruling to the US Supreme Court.In that case, the Court determined that impeachment proceedings are non-justiciable, and are political matters, or the province of Congress. The 1993 Nixon case set a formal precedent preventing impeached officials from appealing their impeachment in court.William Rehnquist wrote the opinion of a unanimous Court. Justices Stevens, White and Souter wrote concurring opinions.
What Presidential right is involved in US v. Nixon?
United States v. Nixon, 347 US 683 (1974)On 24 July 1974, the US Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Nixon, that Executive Privilege did NOT apply in a criminal matter, unless the protected information involved military or diplomatic secrets, or national security. This decision is what led to Nixon's resignation on 9 August 1974.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Who wrote the majority decision in Nixon v US?
United States v. Nixon, 418 US 683 (1974)Chief Justice Warren Burger wrote the opinion of a unanimous (8-0) Court. Justice William Rehnquist recused himself because of his close ties to the Nixon administration.[Note: The question originally asked about Nixon v. United States, a case involving appeal of impeachment of a Mississippi federal District Court judge, in 1993. See Related Questions for information about that case.]For more information about United States v. Nixon, see Related Questions, below.
What principle was established by US v Nixon in 1974?
Executive privilege is permitted as long as it does not interfere with due process.
What principle was established by US v. Nixon (1974)?
Executive privilege is permitted as long as it does not interfere with due process.
What was the outcome us v. Nixon?
The outcome of United States v. Nixon was a unanimous 8-0 decision by the Supreme Court, ruling that President Nixon must turn over tape recordings and other materials subpoenaed as evidence in the Watergate scandal. This decision established the principle that the President is not immune from the judicial process and must comply with court orders. As a result, Nixon resigned from the presidency shortly after the ruling.
Why was US v Nixon an activist decision?
US v Nixon (1974) is often considered an activist decision because the Supreme Court actively intervened in a political matter by deciding that President Nixon must turn over the White House tapes as evidence in the Watergate scandal. The Court's ruling expanded the power of the judiciary by asserting its authority over the executive branch. It is considered activist because it went beyond interpreting the law and made a decision with significant political implications.
What lessons did future U.S. leaders learn from the 1974 U.S. supreme court case US v. Nixon?
The president is accountable for obeying the law.
Where did United States v. Nixon take place?
United States v. Nixon, 418 US 683 (1974)US v. Nixon was within the jurisdiction of the District of Columbia (Washington, DC), the United States' federal government's capitol. The case was first heard in US District Court for the District of Columbia, under Judge John Sirica, then appealed directly to the US Supreme Court, bypassing the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
