answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The Supreme Court passed Brown v. The Board of Education in 1954; this case was pivotal in ending the 'separate, but equal' doctrine that had perpetuated segregation. It illuminated the fact that separate was inherently not equal.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

6mo ago

The Supreme Court did not play a direct role in legalizing segregation. In fact, the Court issued several significant rulings that challenged and overturned segregation laws. For example, in Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the Court declared "separate but equal" segregation in public schools unconstitutional. However, certain Supreme Court decisions, like Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), perpetuated the "separate but equal" doctrine and set the stage for segregation laws. It took many years and additional Supreme Court decisions to dismantle legalized segregation.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was the supreme courts role in legalizing segregation?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is the judiciary of our government?

it is the supreme courts role is to interpret the constitution


What is the role of the Canada supreme court?

The Supreme Court of Canada is the highest court in the country. It hears appeals fro the provincial Courts of Appeal


The contemporary debate over the Supreme Courts role is really about a proper balance between?

Government authority versus individual rights


What is the role of civil courts in employee relations?

the role of civil courts in employee relations


What role does the Supreme Court play in the amendment process?

it proposes and passes amendments


Can the US Supreme Court be a plaintiff challenging a law?

No, the US Supreme Court can't serve a dual role as both plaintiff and judiciary. Legislation may only be challenged by people or entities that are directly, significantly, and negatively affected by a law, and must have a grievance that can be remediated by the courts. The courts themselves do not challenge laws.


What role did Roger Taney play in determine whether or not slaves could sue in the courts?

Taney led the U.S. Supreme Court as Chief Justice in the Dred Scott decision.


What court system includes state and federal courts?

The Constitution established only one federal court, the Supreme Court. It left to Congress the job of creating the federal court system. Congress has created three types of federal courts. 1. District Courts--the nation is divided into 94 federal judicial districts, each with its own district court. These are the courts where cases are tried. 2. Courts of Appeals. The District Courts are divided into 12 regions, called circuits. Each circuit has its own Court of Appeals. There is also a Federal Circuit which covers the entire nation. If a person looses a case in the district court that person can appeal the case to the court of appeals. 3 The Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is the highest of the federal courts. Cases from the court of appeals in each circuit and from the state supreme courts can be appealed to the Supreme Court.


What role did roger b Taney play in in determining whether or not slaves could sue in the courts?

Taney led the U.S. Supreme Court as Chief Justice in the Dred Scott decision.


What role did roger taney in determining weather or not slaves could sue in the courts?

The Supreme Court decision in Dred Scot was that slaves were property and had no rights. This meant they couldn't sue in court.


What role did roger B. Taney play in determining whether or not slaves could sue in courts?

Taney led the U.S. Supreme Court as Chief Justice in the Dred Scott decision.


What role did Roger B Taney Play in determining whether not slaves could sue in the courts?

Taney led the U.S. Supreme Court as Chief Justice in the Dred Scott decision.