answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

No taxation without representation.

User Avatar

Russel Paucek

Lvl 10
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was virtual representation and how did it effect the colonies?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What was the virtual representation and how did it affect the colonies?

No taxes without representation


What did virtual representation mean for the colonies?

Virtual representation was a scapegoat to let Parliament tax the colonies even though the colonies couldn't elect members for Parliament. It meant Britain could tax the colonies without colonial representation.


What is the definition of Actual vs virtual representation?

In the British ruled colonies, Britain had a polcy of Parlaimentary virtual representation, which meant that the colonies were represented through someone living in Britain based on a particular commonatily. For example: All shoemakers in colonial new England were virtually represented by a British showmaker. The colonists were angered at the Mother countries policy of virtual representation because they were forced to pay taxes withour being actually represented in Parlaiment. The colonist marched through the streets shouting "no taxation without representation!". Tis is the main difference between the two. I hope this helps.


How did King James shut down colonial assembly?

He believed the colonies were represented by "virtual representation" in Parliament already. So, they did not need their own assemblies.


Why did colonies cry no taxation without representation?

The British Parliament was taxing the colonies. The colonies had no representation in the Parliament.


What was Virtual representation and how did it affect the colonist?

Virtual Representation was rejected by the colonists and their delegates when Parliament began taxing them without their consent - remember: "no taxation without representation"


What was virtual representation and how did it affect colonists?

Virtual Representation was rejected by the colonists and their delegates when Parliament began taxing them without their consent - remember: "no taxation without representation"


What did the argument between great Britain and its American colonies between the 1760s and 1770s over virtual representation concern?

Parliament's ability to reflect colonial assemblies.


What is the difference between virtual representation and direct representation?

virtual is the friendship of love with ones who have passed and direct is the love with friends close by


How did political representation differ in the colonies and in England?

Political representation differed in the colonies when compared to England. The colonists did not have any representation. The English citizens did.


How is the term no taxation without representation and the stamp act linked?

Taxation without representation refers to the British Parliament's disregard of the colonies. The colonists believed in real representation: a representative must be from the same region that he is representing. However, the members of Parliament had never been to the colonies. They simply assumed the colonial support (virtual representation). The Stamp Act was the first revenue oriented tax that Britain had imposed on the colonies. The colonists were not accustomed to external taxes, as they had a system of self-taxation. This tax caused great opposition in the colonies.


The colonists believed in actual representation while the British Parliament believed in?

i belive you meant Direct representaton. the british belived in virtual representation which just means that there are people in parlement that represent them, but they have never been to the colonies. kind of like a cat with a tag that says "dog"