Lamarck's theory is based on acquired characteristics. In other words if you break your arm your future children will be born with broken arms.
No it does not, its a legend Pokemon rumors say it evolve into azelf but there wrong so no uxie does NOT evolve =]
Eratosthenes proved the world is flat theory wrong
Darwin's theory is completely wrong. No living thing has ever evolved into another living thing because their entire body would have changed, including their organs. Some great scientists experimented and even proved Darwin's theories wrong. All living things stay the way they are made and never evolve. Hope this helps!
There is only one central "theory of evolution", which is the theory of evolution by natural selection that Charles Darwin pioneered. There have been different theories in the past - such as Jean-baptise Lamarck's theory of acquired traits - but these lost their status of scientific theory when they were shown to be wrong.
His two main concepts, acquired characteristics and a innate " desire " to evolve, were both unsupported by any evidence and were not the way evolution happens. So, Lamarck's " theory " ( in the vulgar sense ) was utterly refuted by the actual evidence and process of evolution.
he was wrong
He doesn't evolve....... if you think he evolves into Mew two, your wrong. Mew is a rare Pokemon, which usually don't evolve.
There's nothing wrong with Homo Sapiens, unless we evolve into another species (and survive) by the time the earth reaches her end.
nothing.
In a word; no.
You're playing with words (how would you like to define "good"), but the bottom line is that any theory can be wrong.
We can proof that newton wrong because some of his theory was proofed wrong.