It was the first time the British Soldiers fired upon American citizens, killing 5 people.
The Patriot version of the Boston Massacre depicted the event as a brutal attack by British soldiers on innocent colonists, emphasizing themes of oppression and tyranny. They portrayed the soldiers as aggressors who fired into a crowd of peaceful protesters, framing the incident as a catalyst for the American Revolution. In contrast, the Loyalist version characterized the soldiers as acting in self-defense against a violent mob, suggesting that the colonists provoked the confrontation. This perspective aimed to justify British actions and maintain loyalty to the Crown.
Before the formal start of the American Revolutionary War, events such as the Boston Massacre contributed to the escalation of hostile sentiments especially among the colonists. The opinion of British soldiers involved in the Massacre (or any of the other pre-war confrontations) would most likely have been approving, as British opinion of the colonists was generally negative, even contemptuous. It is possible that some few British soldiers were apathetic or even sympathetic toward the welfare of the colonists affected by the Massacre.
Andre Albert Lowe
they are differ by explorers
its differ bc world war 1 was more important
ni
he made it to America
hdydtyitit
Renaissance art differ from earlier periods in terms of painting technique Renaissance artists used oil paints on dry walls.
I love justin beiber
He took many people with him i think
what were the reasons for european imperalism in the 19th century