The Romans protected themselves with massive and heavy blocks of wood nailed together. Wheels were attached to the bottom and they were rolled along the battle grounds, providing protection for injured or non-fighting soldiers.
The caligae (singular caliga) the hobnailed military boots with a heavy soil of the Roman soldiers, were open and resembled sandals. This was done to air the feet and reduce the likelihood of blisters and problems such as athlete's foot which could occur with long marches. However, in colder climes the soldiers wore closed boots. This was for protection from both cold and damp. Some of the areas in the colder zones were Roman soldiers were stationed were waterlogged. Soldiers also wore socks (udones) when it was cold. They were made in two ways, either by cutting them from fabric and stitching them together or by the sprang work method. Roman closed boots and heavy socks have been found near Hadrian's Wall.
There were many ways that a Roman could build loyalty. On a personal level, a man could pay off another's debt, he could arrange a marriage and automatically gain the loyalty of another family besides his own--very useful if he were considering public office--or he could free a slave. Freedmen owed loyalty to their former masters. On a national level loyalty of their allies was ensured by the protection of the Roman army, trade, and the many benefits of Roman technology and sometimes Roman citizenship.
The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.The noun "Roman" is tricky. It can be a singular noun, such as, "the Roman lives here " or an adjective such as "the Roman empire". I have seen the possessive used both ways but Roman's is most common. You could always sidestep the issue by using the phrase "of the Romans" such as, "the territory of the Romans" instead of the Romans' territory.
The Roman army was extremely important in the spreading of roman culture. The main way that it expanded roman culture was that the legionnaires who made up the majority of the early to imperial roman army were allowed to settle in territories their legion had conquered. For example many of the soldiers of the Roman legions that conquered the majority of Britain settled there. Many of these soldiers married a local women and this led to quite a rapid transformation of the culture. As many of these soldiers had children, the population would start to become more Roman until what was left was a fusion of Roman and local culture.
no protection
When it comes to cable protection, there are many ways to protect the cables from damage. A if a person wants basic coverage, they could use tape on the cable, or if they want some better protection, they could use a thing like Grip Guard Cable Protector.
b/c they could be linked to the south where slaveowners could try to capture them. and the african-american soliders were enslaved and then they were used more in the war than the white union soliders.
Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.Basically they saved their money and paid their master. Roman slaves, especially the domestic and urban slaves, were not without funds. They had several ways of earning their own money and could build up their "peculium" or savings.
There are many ways! 100s!
The middle east benefited from Roman rule in many ways. They enjoyed Roman protection, trade with the western part of the empire, and most of all Roman technology of the aqueduct, giving them fresh and plentiful water for both personal use and irrigation. The Romans benefited by taxes, military recruits, and also trade.
there are various ways and means of protecting the consumerms
A plastic bag.