The constitution isn't interpreted using evolutionists thinking. It is a foundation for government and by definition a philosophy like evolution doesn't fit within the interpretation of the constitution.
It was a person who believed in the original intent of the founders and the Constitution. Instead of interpreting it in new ways, as a loose constructionalist does, a strict constructionalist usually reads in word and words and interprets it as it clearly states.
There various ways that the US Constitution and state constitutions are similar. The two main ways are the fact that they both define governments and allow for amendments.
Thinking through lots of ways to solve a puzzle
Why not?
Five
Scientific reasoning is more disciplined and more logical than other ways of thinking.
Medieval ways of thinking were based on traditional
There are three main ways that the US Constitution can be adapted to the changes that take place within the country. These ways include amending it, interpretation, and adding to it.
Freud challenged old ways of thinking as he was essentially the founder of modern psychology. Einstein challenged old ways of thinking by discovering the photoelectric effect which was instrumental in creating quantum theory.
yes
divergent thinking
It is using critical thinking skills.