The standard weapon for soldiers of the British empire during WW2 was the No 4. Mk 1 or Mk 2 Lee Enfield, which was a 10 round magazine fed bolt action rifle that fired a .303 caliber bullet (the magazine was not designed to be removed for anything other than cleaning)
Another weapon was the "Sten" gun, which was a compact sub machinegun made primarily out of stamped steel ( which was for it's time was unusual ) it had a 30 round magazine and fired 9mm parabellum ammunition (which was the same rounds as those used by the German MP40)
The standard squad machinegun was the "Bren" which fired from 30 round magazines though i cant recall what caliber rounds they fired, considering this was their only source of large volumes of fire they tended to be outgunned by superior German MG42s (which could fire at a staggering 1,200 rounds a minute, nearly twice as many rounds as the Brits could fire faster then just about any machinegun if not all of them altogether)
One of the most notorious traits the British were known for though was being trained to perform what was called the 'mad minute' in which British soldiers would fire anywhere from 15 to 30 rounds a in a minute using their standard Enfield bolt-action rifles, not to mention these were AIMED shots which once again was an incredible feat for the time.
(Note: if i messed up on any of my facts here let me know.)
Well Chief, America and England have been around for a few years now. If you're talking about the Revolutionary War, they generally used Muskets, Cannons and to a lesser extent swords. Might want to specify a time period. I would get more detailed but your incoherent question didn't earn enough of my time.
nukes tanks rpg
they pioneered tanks
Two advantages the British had over the patriots were the British had a Navy and the Patriots didn't and the British had a well trained and more experienced army than the Patriots.
The British used the standard British Army rifle and the Zulu's used the short assegai.
It was not a miracle, but it did enable nearly 200,000 British soldiers to escape capture, though without their weapons, and it provided a core of experienced men to expand the British Army. Other than that, there was no great impact.
Many stolen, lost or outdated weapons of the British armed forces along with anything else they could find.
they were not well organize they fought on unknown land the support they got from Britain was weak they had a big army that outnumbered the continental army they had better equipment (weapons..etc)
You are not allowed to buy weapons when you are in the British army. This is against the laid down rules and regulations. It is the military that assigns its soldiers the weapons.
black smiths
They weren't trained soldiers, they had weapons that weren't as good as the British's, the British army had more men....
The British were going to collect dangerous weapons stored.
The British were going to collect dangerous weapons stored.
The British were going to collect dangerous weapons stored.
The continental army surrounded british forces in Boston.cannon and other weapons were brought in to help the continental army.
Two advantages the British had over the patriots were the British had a Navy and the Patriots didn't and the British had a well trained and more experienced army than the Patriots.
The British used the standard British Army rifle and the Zulu's used the short assegai.
It was the most Significant Army in the Ancient World . It does use Iron Weapons as the First Army in the World. also invented the Wheels and used them in War. Swords and other Advanced weapons..
When leader Thomas Gage heard there was a stockpile of weapons in Concord he decided to march his army and seize the supplies.
the answer actually is Sepoys.