0
The ancient Roman armies used a variety of weapons in their battles with their opponents. Here are a number of them:
* javelins or also called spears;
* swords of various types;
* catapults to throw rocks and burning oils into enemy fortresses and into enemy battle lines; and
* protective armour and helmets, although not exactly "weapons" they were essential to fighting battles.
What else can I help you with?
What weapon was not used in the Roman army?
The roman army did not use nuclear weapons.
Who used roman weapons?
Roman weapons were used by the Roman army.
Why was roman army success?
The Roman army was so successful because of their strict discipline, rigorous training, and their will to win. They also had the best equipment and the "high-tech" weapons of their time and they knew how to use them.
Did you need to bring your own weapons into the roman army?
not 100% sure
What weapons did slingers have in the roman army?
i'm guessing guns and large knives
What kind of weapons would you use in the Army?
Depends. Which army?
What made the roman armies so strong?
Best weapons -------------------------------- Also the high discipline the the roman legions were very famous for, and the extensive training a legionnaire had to go through before joining the ranks of the army. Weapons and armor played a roll in improving the strength of the roman army as well.
What has the author A Forestier written?
A. Forestier has written: 'The Roman soldier' -- subject(s): Army, Weapons
What did Roman charioteers hold in their hands when they were racing?
The Roman charioteers did not carry weapons; they were racing drivers. The only weapon-like object they carried was a knife for cutting themselves free from the reigns to prevent being dragged by the horses if they had a spill. The Roman army did not use fighting chariots. Their mobile forces were on horseback--- the cavalry.The Roman charioteers did not carry weapons; they were racing drivers. The only weapon-like object they carried was a knife for cutting themselves free from the reigns to prevent being dragged by the horses if they had a spill. The Roman army did not use fighting chariots. Their mobile forces were on horseback--- the cavalry.The Roman charioteers did not carry weapons; they were racing drivers. The only weapon-like object they carried was a knife for cutting themselves free from the reigns to prevent being dragged by the horses if they had a spill. The Roman army did not use fighting chariots. Their mobile forces were on horseback--- the cavalry.The Roman charioteers did not carry weapons; they were racing drivers. The only weapon-like object they carried was a knife for cutting themselves free from the reigns to prevent being dragged by the horses if they had a spill. The Roman army did not use fighting chariots. Their mobile forces were on horseback--- the cavalry.The Roman charioteers did not carry weapons; they were racing drivers. The only weapon-like object they carried was a knife for cutting themselves free from the reigns to prevent being dragged by the horses if they had a spill. The Roman army did not use fighting chariots. Their mobile forces were on horseback--- the cavalry.The Roman charioteers did not carry weapons; they were racing drivers. The only weapon-like object they carried was a knife for cutting themselves free from the reigns to prevent being dragged by the horses if they had a spill. The Roman army did not use fighting chariots. Their mobile forces were on horseback--- the cavalry.The Roman charioteers did not carry weapons; they were racing drivers. The only weapon-like object they carried was a knife for cutting themselves free from the reigns to prevent being dragged by the horses if they had a spill. The Roman army did not use fighting chariots. Their mobile forces were on horseback--- the cavalry.The Roman charioteers did not carry weapons; they were racing drivers. The only weapon-like object they carried was a knife for cutting themselves free from the reigns to prevent being dragged by the horses if they had a spill. The Roman army did not use fighting chariots. Their mobile forces were on horseback--- the cavalry.The Roman charioteers did not carry weapons; they were racing drivers. The only weapon-like object they carried was a knife for cutting themselves free from the reigns to prevent being dragged by the horses if they had a spill. The Roman army did not use fighting chariots. Their mobile forces were on horseback--- the cavalry.
Why were the Roman Army so successful for there training?
They were highly disciplined, with intelligent and effective commanders, were issued good quality equipment, and were well trained in the use of their equipment and effective combat formations and manoeuvres. The Romans also made a point of learning as much as they could about their enemies prior to engaging them in combat so they could take advantages of the enemies weaknesses and take contingencies against their strengths.Of course this was not always the case, most of the major defeats of the Roman army can be traced to failures of one or more of these factors.
How the roman army was the best?
they were governed properly had the best weapons and turned prisoners into well trained warriors
Do samurai and US army solders use the same weapons?
No.
