Want this question answered?
Knights were nobles so they took care of their estates/manors and fought wars.
They did the odd jobs for knights and were in training to become knights. They were the son's of nobles who showed promise of knighthood.
king nobles knights peasants
Feudalism give the nobles land from the lords in exchange for military protection from the knights who were usually sons of the nobles. Feudalism gave some stability to the nobles in a what was a violent era.
Kinights were nobles so they lived and acted as nobles did. A common man could NOT be a knight.
There both fighters
Knights are nobles because they are sons of knights wich are nobles.
Yes, because the king could call upon his knights and nobles to fight a war.
balls
the king or nobles and knights and the servants plus family of the nobles and kings
the king or nobles and knights and the servants plus family of the nobles and kings
Knights were nobles so they took care of their estates/manors and fought wars.
They did the odd jobs for knights and were in training to become knights. They were the son's of nobles who showed promise of knighthood.
Knights and nobles
Feudalism
The Nobles and knights - the knights counted too, because if the nobles lost power they would too; the nobles were the ones who paid them, and the nobles were getting powerless, so that was the same for the knights. if the commoners didnt get paid to go to war then it would be a different story. Hope that makes any sense. O(^__^)O
Nobles of the sword would sometimes take a knights place and nobles of the robe would more than likely take the kings place.