they got along pretty well
Yes, the Italian city states did make use of the seminaries to make deals with each other.
The reason that some city states were semi democratic and others weren't is because the city states were constantly at war with one another, and didn't communicate with each other that much as is
The citiy-states attacked each other in varying alliances.
Actually, all the Greek city-states spoke Greek; there may have been regional accents, but the citizens could all understand each other.
Philip built up his military strength in conquering Thrace and other aer areas. He subverted some Greek city-states by bribery. The other Greek city-states were badly weakened by the Peloponnesian War and continuing ongoing wars between each other, and could not mount an effective resistance.
If you are talking about city-states in ancient times, they were basically counties. How they got along is opinional, there were a few wars between them but for the most part they cooperated with each other pretty good.
They each had their own armies and military units. The city-states also had their own government, which in Athens, their government was a democracy. The culture in the city-states are different from other city-states as well.
Athens was one of the 2,000 city-states which fought each other over a thousand years.
Yes, the Italian city states did make use of the seminaries to make deals with each other.
City-states fought each other for farmland to expand their territory, increase agricultural production, and gain more resources for their populations. This competition for land was driven by the need for food security and economic growth, as well as the desire for power and influence over neighboring regions.
City states fought each other for farmland because agriculture was the main source of food and wealth, and having more land meant more resources for the city state. Control over farmland also led to economic dominance and increased population growth, which was crucial for a city state's power and influence.
bjgiohutruh5
i dont no
Thanks
the sumerians fought against each other because they were fighting for farmland.
Yes they did they had many wealthy cultires amd helped other city-states
City states fought each other for farmland because agriculture was crucial for sustaining their populations and ensuring food security. More farmland meant the ability to grow more food, support a larger population, and increase their economic power. As a result, city states often sought to expand their territory through warfare to gain control of fertile land for farming.