answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The main argument as to whether or not the Constitution should be ratified centered around the fact that it didn't contain a Bill of Rights. Federalists wanted a strong national government. Anti-federalists felt that without a Bill of Rights, the government would have too much power.

User Avatar

Zula Muller

Lvl 13
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Alyce Corkery

Lvl 13
1y ago

The main argument as to whether or not the Constitution should be ratified centered around the fact that it didn't contain a Bill of Rights. Federalists wanted a strong national government. Anti-federalists felt that without a Bill of Rights, the government would have too much power.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

The main argument as to whether or not the Constitution should be ratified centered around the fact that it didn't contain a Bill of Rights. Federalists wanted a strong national government. Anti-federalists felt that without a Bill of Rights, the government would have too much power.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What were main argument for and against ratification of the constitution?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What was the the main argument of the antifederalists against the constitution?

they didn't get to practice the Bill of Rights


What was the main argument of the Antifederalists against constitution?

they didn't get to practice the Bill of Rights


What was the main idea behind the Federalist Papers?

The main role of the Federalist Papers was to raise support for the ratification of the Constitution.


What was the main argument between federalists and anti-federalists?

Federalists wanted to urge the Constitution to be in action, but the Anti-Federalists didn't want the Constitution to be in commencement. They were against it.


What was the main idea of the federalists paper?

to stress the need for ratification of the Constitution


What was the main idea of the federalist papers?

to stress the need for ratification of the Constitution


The main argument against the need for a Bill of Rights was that?

a Bill of Rights was unnecessary because the Constitution already placed limits on the government's power and protected individual rights.


What was the main reason antifederalists opposed ratification of the new constitution?

They believed that the Constitution diminished states' rights.


What was the main argument in favor of the bill of rights?

The main argument that was made in favor of the Bill of Rights was that it would guard against the emergence of a tyrannical government. The anti-Federalists, in particular, fought to have the Bill of Rights included in the Constitution.


What was the main argument in favor of Bill of Rights?

The main argument that was made in favor of the Bill of Rights was that it would guard against the emergence of a tyrannical government. The anti-Federalists, in particular, fought to have the Bill of Rights included in the Constitution.


Which was the main reason that federalist supported the ratification of the constitution?

The main reason was the need for a stronger Federal government.


Which was the main reason that federalist support ratification of the constitution?

The main reason was the need for a stronger Federal government.