0
What else can I help you with?
Did the Nazis use original torture methods did they base them on other torture ideals if they didn't then who did they extract them from?
The Nazis used both established tortures for that time and also created new ones. They experimented with medical torture, for example, which was very new then. The Nazis were probably were the first group to use sexual torture as routine standard practice.
What is the significance of the inquisitor's flail in medieval torture methods?
The inquisitor's flail was a tool used in medieval torture methods to inflict pain and extract confessions from individuals accused of heresy or other crimes. Its significance lies in its ability to cause intense physical suffering, making it a feared instrument of punishment during that time period.
What is a sentence for torture?
A senence for torture is: The people in a long time ago had to torture men or even women who did something bad
What year was the head crusher torture device made?
The head crusher torture device is believed to have been developed in the late Middle Ages, with references to its use dating back to the 15th century. While the exact year of its invention is unclear, it was notably used during the period of the Inquisition and throughout the Renaissance. Its design and use exemplified the brutal methods of torture employed during that time.
How do Egyptians torture people?
Methods of torture in Egypt entirely depend on the government in power at the time. In Ancient Egypt, innocent people were kept as slaves and whipped. If someone tried to steal somthing from the Pharaoh or his entourage, they were often executed. In modern Egypt, torture is officially illegal, although there are numerous stories of torture by the Egyptian police. Some forms of torture are mild, such as sensory overload, sleep deprivation and similar problems. Egyptian police are also known to have waterboarded and aggresively beaten individuals for information. However, Egyptian police do not often perform the more aggressive forms of torture that are universally condemned.
How was Jesus Crucified naked or with clothes?
Yes, Jesus was hung on the cross naked. Crucifixion was the highest form of torture and humiliation of that time. In the bible it says that the woman watched Jesus from a distance. Most likely because He was hanging there naked. I have also heard that they also hung Him naked to show that He was circumcised (the Jewish belief).
What are some questions people ask about medieval torture?
People often ask about the methods and purposes of medieval torture, such as what devices were commonly used and how they functioned. Others inquire about the historical context, including who was targeted and the legal justifications for torture during that time. Additionally, many are curious about the psychological impact on both the victims and the perpetrators, as well as how these practices influenced modern views on justice and human rights.
Why did Jesus get whipped?
Jesus was whipped as part of his crucifixion, which was a form of punishment and torture used by the Romans. The scourging was meant to weaken the victim before crucifixion and inflict additional pain and humiliation. It was a common practice during that time.
What is the difference between assault and torture?
You mean besides 'assault is hitting someone and torture is constant abuse for a period of time'?
How did Jesus and St Paul travel in Bible times?
Walking and travel by boat were common methods of travel at the time. Jesus mostly walked with some short sojourns by boat, and Paul travelled extensively by boat.
How much jail time a first time offender for torture?
25 years.
What is the thesis in a case for torture?
The thesis in a case for torture typically argues that under certain extreme circumstances, such as ticking time bomb scenarios, the use of torture may be justified to extract critical information that could save lives. Proponents claim that the potential to prevent imminent threats outweighs the moral and ethical objections to torture. They often assert that traditional interrogation methods may be insufficient in urgent situations, making torture a necessary evil for national security. However, this perspective is heavily contested due to concerns about human rights, the reliability of information obtained under duress, and the broader implications for society and legal standards.
