They were called Iron Clads.
They weren't. They were the USS Monitor and the CSS Virginia. The CSS Virginia was built from the hull of the USS Merrimac, which was sunk and burned by the Union when they left the shipyard.
They weren't. They were the USS Monitor and the CSS Virginia. The CSS Virginia was built from the hull of the USS Merrimac, which was sunk and burned by the Union when they left the shipyard.
First, they were not submarines- they were ships that had iron plating (instead of just wood). They were very low to the water, but not subs. Secondly, the ships were the United States Monitor, and the Confederate States Virginia, which had been rebuilt on the hull of a ship originally called the Merrimac.
The Monitor and the Virginia (also known as the Merrimack.)
The USS Monitor.
The USS Monitor and the CSS Virginia. The CSS Virginia was originally the USS Merrimac.
USS Monitor
USS Monitor and CSS Virginia fought to draw in 1862 signaling the end of wooden naval ships.
AnswerIt was the first battle between ironclad warships.Monitor vs. Virginia (converted from the Merrimack)The battle between the Monitor and Virginia was important because it was the first naval battle where the ships involved used armored plating.
It was the first time iron ships fought against each other. Officially it was the USS Monitor against the CSS Virginia. The Virginia was made from the sunken hull of the USS Merrimack.
The battle between the USS Monitor and the CSS Virginia changed the way warships were built. The two ships were both ironclad warships.
The USS Monitor had a ships complement of 59 Officers and men while the CSS Virginia was manned by 320 Officers and men. This represented the significant differences in armament : Virginia carried 12 guns compared to Monitor's turret armament of only 2 eleven-inch guns.