patriots would debate about freedom with patriots
The cast of The Real Debate - 2006 includes: Pete Barker Geoffrey Guerrero Eric Radecki
yes vampires are real, bats are vampires. but human vampires are not real
Loyalists
he was the person who was against british
It depends who you ask. If you ask England British of course but if you ask North America, then Patriots. In my personal opinion I think the patriots were strong and fought long and hard through a tough battle. They endured many hardships such as going days without a real meal, and frozen toes and everything such as that. I say the Patriots. They were just strong with all the things they faced. (unless you are talking about the football team I like the cowboys haha)
This has always been a topic of debate over the years.
"Patriots" was the term used to for those who supported resistance to the policies of King George and his ministers and, later, independence from England. Of course, if you believed that King George the third, his ministers and Parliament and their policies were right, you might have considered yourself a patriot or, as they became known, Loyalists. And you might have considered the men who were meeting in Philadelphia at the Continental Congresses to discuss the rights that the colonists had under the British government were not fair and what to do about that, to be rebels. Had the Patriots lost, history likely would have remembered them as the Traitors, the Rebels, the Men of the Uprising of '75, or some other term, and the Loyalist might have been considered the real patriots.
The Declaration of Independence showed what the patriots wanted, and the Treaty of Paris made the dream real.
Real American Voter - 2012 Debate Special Debates About Something 1-10 was released on: USA: 3 October 2012
We have no actual evidence of this, this topic is a bit of a debate, but as far as we know, they do not exist.
One important effect of debate (perhaps we could call it a goal) is discovering the other parties' real concerns. Sometimes a painless compromise is possible because the sides don't actually want the very same things. This isn't apparent without debate because the human tendency is to assert "rights" to everything and to expect the other guys to take whatever's left over.
To mock means 'to make fun of' and "Mock" is used to mean practice or pretend, as in "Mock Exams", a "Mock Debate", a "Mock Trial", things students could do in a school in preparation, perhaps, for the real thing.