The negative effect of sharecropping and tenant farming was that it was tipped heavily in favor of the landowner. African American families would rent small shares of land to work themselves with a portion of the crop to be given to the landowner at the end of the harvest. However, the sharecroppers ended up owing more to the landowner, for the use of tools and for supplies, than they were able to repay.
A sharecropper could move up to tenant farming if he could accumulate his own equipment and money. He could even become a cash tenant if he could rasie enough crops to sell. Unfortunately, due to crop failure, laziness, low crop prices, ill health, exhaustion of the soil, poor management, and high interest rates, many tenant farmers were unable to maintain their staus as cash or share tenants and ended up losing their farms.
Sharecropping is great for the owner, and a bare minimum living for the sharecropper. It is economic slavery.
sharecropping affected African Americans and poor whites.
sharecropping=)
hell nawl
no
sharecropping
farmers had to pay cash rent as well as shares of crop
sharecropping
because the slave holders lost their slaves cause of the 14th amendment, so in the fields of sharecropping... they were not paid. -
They extended social problems and lack of equality after the end of slavery
13 14 15 amendments Sharecropping All the states back into the US
Landownership would be an antonym for sharecropping, as it refers to owning land outright as opposed to a tenant farming arrangement.
The families lived on sharecropping land
sharecropping affected African Americans and poor whites.
Cesar had done sharecropping with his neighbor's.
sharecropping=)
Sharecropping
Sharecropping itself is not illegal, but the exploitative practices often associated with it can be illegal, such as unfair land rental agreements or poor labor conditions. Some countries have laws regulating agricultural arrangements like sharecropping to protect the rights of tenants and prevent exploitation.