For the Crusaders in the Middle Ages, one fighting-method might be utilized over another in any given battle or campaign; however, three basic methods were generally available. The first was horse-related, with the armored knight as its most fearsome example. The second was the foot-advance, with diversely armed soldiers, whether using blades, cudgels, or spears of some kind, advancing against the enemy. The third was bow-based: stringed/bow weapons were increasingly used by the Crusaders, with the crossbow eventually serving as an especially effective weapon against their Arabic opponents.
The crusaders were Catholic, mainly fighting Muslims.
They were fighting over the holy land of Jerusalem
the crusaders were fighting muslims to capture the holy land of Jerusalem.
The armies that the Crusaders were fighting were mostly compromised of either Muslims or Christians. They were claiming to be fighting for religion.
Jordan how r u
muslims
12,000
12,000
The armies that the Crusaders were fighting were mostly compromised of either Muslims or Christians. They were claiming to be fighting for religion.
The Crusades were the battle and a battle does not fight, soldiers in the battle fight. If your question was asking what the Crusaders were fighting for and who they were fighting against see the below link.
Salah al-Din had highest regards for crusaders,since they were fighting to protect their religion in true sense. He thought crusaders did not know that their religion was denigrating in the hands of their leaders..............
12,000