The Borden jurors:George Potter, Wm. F. Dean, John Wilbar, Lemuel C. Wilber, Wm. Westcot, Louis B. Hodges, Augustus Swift, Frank G. Cole, John C. Finn, Allen H. Wordell and Silas D. Dammon.
*Footnote:This list does not include alternates.
Lizzie Borden was no 'Cinderella' by any stretch of the imagination. She was a double murderer, who thanks to a biased jury, was turned loose to spend her father's hard earned money.
During Lizzie Borden's trial in 1892 women were not allowed to serve on a jury. In some states women could vote in 1918, but in 1920 it became nation-wide.
Mention of his familiarity with the Borden family
Since the question does not specify the debth of the timeline such as her life, trial, ect., I will list from the murders to her aquittal. Abbey Borden was killed at 9:30am. Andrew Borden was killed at 11:10am. August 4, 1892. Lizzie arrested August 11, 1892. Grand Jury hearing to determine evidence sufficiant for trial November 7, 1892. Grand Jury handed down indictment on Dec. 12, 1892. Trial begins on June 5, 1893. Jury deliberates on June 19, 1893. Verdict in on June 20, 1893. Lizzie released June 20, 1893.
During the Lizzie Borden trial, the prosecution's strategy was to present a circumstantial case to convince the jury of Lizzie Borden's guilt. They focused on Lizzie's motive for the murders, inconsistencies in her statements, and physical evidence such as the hatchet found in the basement. The prosecution aimed to establish Lizzie Borden's opportunity, means, and motive to commit the crime.
The statement was a little long so I posted a website for the information.
Here is the time line begining with the double murders of Andrew and Abbey Borden: Murder August 4, 1892. Lizzie Borden arrested on August 11, 1892. Grand Jury hearing on November 7, 1892. Grand Jury hands down indictment of Lizzie Borden on December 2, 1892. Murder trial begins June 5, 1893. Jury retires to deliberate on June 19, 1893. Verdict returned on June 20, 1893. Aquittal, Borden released. *The trial lasted from June 5, 1893 to June 20, 1893.
With her arrest on August 11, 1892, which I consider the beginning of the case, to the Grand Jury hearings and indictment on November 7, 1892 and December 12, 1892 respectively, opening of her trial on June 5, 1893, jury deliberations on June 19, 1893 to the handing down of the verdict on June 20, 1893, which brought an end to the legal proceedings.
Emma was Lizzie's sister's name. She was about 10 years older than Lizzie and took care of Lizzie after the death of their mother when Lizzie was around 3. Emma was visiting friends in another town when the murders took place. She stood by Lizzie through her arrest and aquittal. Neither sister wanted to return to the house after the murders so Lizzie bought a much bigger house in a fancier neighborhood and Emma lived there with her for several years. But something happened between the sisters and Emma moved to a house of her own which was much more modest. The Borden's remained estranged for the rest of their lives. There was a rumor that the dispute between the sisters was an inappropriate relationship Lizzie had with an actress from New York City. But whatever the disagreement, the women were never able to totally reconcile. Emma died within days of Lizzie in early 1927. At the death of their father and stepmother, Emma and Lizzie shared equally all of the Borden assets, which were substantial. At their deaths Emma's wealth had more than doubled. She led a very modest and quiet existance. Unlike Lizzie who had spent a good portion of her inheritance. She entertained for people from out of town. The jury found her not guilty but the people of Fall River were of a different opinion and Lizzie was ostrasized by the majority of the people she used to socialize with. She spent money sometimes without thought. She had also spent a conciderable amount helping her actress friend, whom had money problems. Today all the Bordens are together again. Lizzie and Emma were buried beside their birth mother, father and stepmother. The house where the murders occured is now used as a bed and breakfast that claims the house is haunted by Lizzie. Who knows, maybe it is.
Jennings was refering to a lack of phyisical evidence against his client Lizzie Borden. The broken hatchett could not be absolutely determined to be the murder weapon. Lizzie's lack of blood on her person should exonorate her, theory being that the killer would have had to have been covered in blood. Jennings declared that Lizzie had no motive to murder her parents. These were the most important points made by the defense.
How about 'Due to the mores and double-standards of Victorian-era America, the jury rejected the evidence at trial to aquitt a female killer'.
That IS what it is known as a TRIAL JURY or a PETIT jury.