0
During the Crisis of the Third Century there were many attacks and raids into the empire. This caused enormous stress for the army, which, although it managed to repel all of them, became overstretched. This caused a period of military anarchy, where many of the emperors were men who rose through the ranks of the army and were proclaimed emperor by their troops instead of aristocrats. Many of these men were assassinated, sometimes by their own troops. The turnover of emperors was rapid. On top of this there were also 35 usurper emperors who were military commanders who were proclaimed emperors in their military areas during military rebellions.
Diocletian and Constantine restored internal stability. However, there still were problems. The size of the army had become enormous and sufficient recruitment became difficult. As a result in the Later Empire there was increasing use of Germanic mercenaries and allied Germanic armies. The provision of supplies for the army, including food, became a mammoth, difficult and expensive task. Getting sufficient funds for the pay for soldiers and officers and the supplies for the army became an almost impossible task. An oppressive tax regime had to be institute to cope with this. It had an adverse effect of rural people, who bore the brunt of this regime.
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoThe Romans hired mercenaries when they needed extra soldiers to fight particular battles or wars or soldiers with specilaised skills like everyone else. Towards the end of the empire the Romans relied on the troops of Roman allies and on mercenaries because there was a shortage of military manpower and there was a lot of pressure on the empire by raiders from outside and invaders.
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoWhen the Roman army began to decline, they made the decision to hire foreign mercenaries. It ended up backfiring on them because these foreigners felt no loyalty to Rome and turned on it.
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoThe only problem with using Germanic soldiers in the Roman army would be the language barrier, which was soon overcome.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why did the roman military form?
why did the roman military form
What was a Roman ballista?
A Roman ballista was a military device or engine for throwing large stones.A Roman ballista was a military device or engine for throwing large stones.A Roman ballista was a military device or engine for throwing large stones.A Roman ballista was a military device or engine for throwing large stones.A Roman ballista was a military device or engine for throwing large stones.A Roman ballista was a military device or engine for throwing large stones.A Roman ballista was a military device or engine for throwing large stones.A Roman ballista was a military device or engine for throwing large stones.A Roman ballista was a military device or engine for throwing large stones.
Did the roman empire have gay men?
No. The Fall of the Roman Empire had many factors, including corruption, bad political decisions, economic problems, and military problems. But gay Romans had nothing to do with it.
Who was in charge of the military in the roman republic?
In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.
What military disadvantage did the Romans have during the Gallic Wars?
It would seem proper in speaking in military terms that the Romans, whether in Caesar's campaigns or in other Roman military actions in Gaul, to have one singular disadvantage. That advantage would be the sheer size of Gaul. In any military operation, the size of a territory, or a nation, if large enough presents logistical problems for an army with plans to conquer it. Roman advantages were plentiful but not relevant to this question.
Why did the Roman Republic turn to the military leaders?
Expansion and war created problems in maintaining social order.
Why did the roman military form?
why did the roman military form
When did the Roman invented the Roman spear?
The roman military
What was a Roman ballista?
A Roman ballista was a military device or engine for throwing large stones.A Roman ballista was a military device or engine for throwing large stones.A Roman ballista was a military device or engine for throwing large stones.A Roman ballista was a military device or engine for throwing large stones.A Roman ballista was a military device or engine for throwing large stones.A Roman ballista was a military device or engine for throwing large stones.A Roman ballista was a military device or engine for throwing large stones.A Roman ballista was a military device or engine for throwing large stones.A Roman ballista was a military device or engine for throwing large stones.
What are Roman military highways?
Roman military highways are the same as the main Roman roads. Remember that the reason the Romans built their roads in the first place was for the military, plus the military men were the ones who constructed the roads.
Did roman fall because of internal problems or external problems?
Roman civilization feel because of internal problems.
Did the roman empire have gay men?
No. The Fall of the Roman Empire had many factors, including corruption, bad political decisions, economic problems, and military problems. But gay Romans had nothing to do with it.
What problem helped weaken the Roman empire?
Rome's military problems weakened the empire because the soldiers started pledging their allegiance not to Rome, but to individual leaders.
Do they have hospitajs in roman time?
tThey had hospitals in Roman times, but only for the military. If a civilian became ill he/she was treated at home.tThey had hospitals in Roman times, but only for the military. If a civilian became ill he/she was treated at home.tThey had hospitals in Roman times, but only for the military. If a civilian became ill he/she was treated at home.tThey had hospitals in Roman times, but only for the military. If a civilian became ill he/she was treated at home.tThey had hospitals in Roman times, but only for the military. If a civilian became ill he/she was treated at home.tThey had hospitals in Roman times, but only for the military. If a civilian became ill he/she was treated at home.tThey had hospitals in Roman times, but only for the military. If a civilian became ill he/she was treated at home.tThey had hospitals in Roman times, but only for the military. If a civilian became ill he/she was treated at home.tThey had hospitals in Roman times, but only for the military. If a civilian became ill he/she was treated at home.
Was roman military like Sparta?
it was all military thats all it was
Who was in charge of the military in the roman republic?
In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.In the Roman republic, the senate was in charge of the military. This was the reason that a Roman political hopeful had to have some military experience in order to be elected to the higher offices. One of the duties of a consul was to lead an army if necessary.
Is the roman military and the roman army the same thing?
yeah you idiot
