The plant will die as water can't go through the plant
is a plant's flowers are missing then A: it's a fruit bush/tree and food will grow soon B: it's dehidrated and dying, give it water C: someone stole them D: the plant's dead E: or you can just take it to a pofessional, and get a better opinion
nothing will happen ,
someone stole it
it dropped
When flowers disappear or die out , not much will happen since it is a flower which evolves into a fruit and the fruit contains the seed from which the plants sprout not the flower !
It would not produce seed.
it will kill you...
There will not be seed formation
it will flower
jbbdcbbuz
Butterflies depend on the nectar from flowers for food. Without the flowering plants that they feed from, butterflies would starve.
If a flowering plant is not pollinated, it cannot produce seeds when the time comes. Think of it as plant sex, like humans, without the male and female cells combining, there can be no child.
Yes. All plants that produce seed have flowers.
Incomplete dominance is where 2 dominant traits are combined, but neither show up in the offspring. This term is easily confused with co-dominance, but there is a difference. An example of incomplete dominance would be where a white flowering plant pollinates a red flowering plant, but their offspring are all pink flowering plants. Since both white and red were dominant, they canceled each other out, and the median color pink shows up in the next generation. Co-dominance is where 2 dominant traits are BOTH expressed. This would be the case if a white flowering plant pollinates a red flowering plant, and their offspring have flowers that are speckled with red and white dots. Both colors still show up, but neither one completely dominates the other.
"All insects, birds, and land animals (even us) would cease to exist." Incorrect. Flowers weren't around untill 125 millions years ago, making them 300 million years younger than the oldest plants. If flowering plants were to go extinct, non-flowering plants would fill in the niche left by the extinct flowering plants. This would go accompanied by a animal mass-extinction event, caused by the disappearance of the flowering plants that formed a substantial part of the food chain. Short answer: A mass-extinction would follow if flowering plants go extinct. If they never existed, the animal kingdom would never have adapted to flowering plants to begin with.
Butterflies depend on the nectar from flowers for food. Without the flowering plants that they feed from, butterflies would starve.
generally yes, depends on the life cycle of the plant. if it was an annual plant the plant would normally die soon after flowering in anycase; perennial plants simply continue flowering and growing
Butterfly is dependent on flowering plants for nectar
If a flowering plant is not pollinated, it cannot produce seeds when the time comes. Think of it as plant sex, like humans, without the male and female cells combining, there can be no child.
Yes. All plants that produce seed have flowers.
my moms garden blossomed.......................................................................................................................................................................................
This will redirect the sap flow to the ancillary buds below and force them into growth giving more shoots but delaying flowering.
it is a flowering plant, how else would it be able to obtin seeds!
The correct term is "true-breeding". What that means is that if he takes his two pea plants with white flowers and breeds them together, he will always get a pea plant with white flowers. Something that is true-breeding for a particular trait is homozygous, i.e. if the allele for red flowers is R and the allele for white flowers is w, then a true-breeding white flowering plant is ww, and true-breeding red flowering plant is RR. If you cross-breed a true-breeding red flowering with a true-breeding white flowering plant, you would get 1/4 of the offspring as true-breeding red flowers, 1/4 of the off-spring as true-breeding white flowers, and 1/2 the offspring as heterozygous (not true-breeding) red flowers - Rw. If you don't start with true-breeding plants - say you start with Rw and ww (a red and a white plant) you get 1/2 the offspring heterozygous red, and 1/2 true-breeding white. Thus if you didn't know anymore, you would assume that half the time when you breed a red and a white plant, you would get a red plant, and half the time a white, which is incorrect. Furthermore, if you conducted the experiment again, say with RR and Rw, you would get a different result (in this case, all red). By starting with plants that are true-breeding, you ensure that you get the same results that properly show how the traits are passed on.
No plant, vegetation, animal, or human life would exist. No flowers, no trees, no oxygen, all existing life would cease.
Flowering plants would be severely impacted and would have to resort, when possible, to self fertilization. Many flowering plant would go extinct and all animal life, including humans, depending on these plants would be also severely impacted.
Incomplete dominance is where 2 dominant traits are combined, but neither show up in the offspring. This term is easily confused with co-dominance, but there is a difference. An example of incomplete dominance would be where a white flowering plant pollinates a red flowering plant, but their offspring are all pink flowering plants. Since both white and red were dominant, they canceled each other out, and the median color pink shows up in the next generation. Co-dominance is where 2 dominant traits are BOTH expressed. This would be the case if a white flowering plant pollinates a red flowering plant, and their offspring have flowers that are speckled with red and white dots. Both colors still show up, but neither one completely dominates the other.