your rotational inertia will be zero
Standing in equilibrium on only one foot for an extended period can improve your balance, strengthen your muscles, and improve your posture. However, it can also put strain on your ankle and foot muscles if done excessively, potentially leading to injuries. It's important to switch feet regularly and not overdo it to prevent strain and maintain a healthy balance.
A bed - it has one foot (the foot of the bed) and four legs (which make it stand as a bed)
This is known as chemical equilibrium. All of the chemicals will want to become stable and this can only happen with equilibrium.
Stand on one foot.
When you stand with only one foot on a weighing scale, the scale reading will show half of your total body weight.
Owls, like all other (uninjured) birds, have two feet. Sometimes a bird will choose to stand on only one foot and will tuck the other foot up inside its feathers, giving the appearance of having only one foot, but that is an illusion.
No, the equilibrium constant might only become zero in the (irrational) situation when NO product(s) is (are) formed, thus when there is NO reaction AT ALL. This will only happen at zero Kelvin.
When you stand on one foot on a scale, the scale will only measure the weight that is being applied through that one foot. This means that the weight measured on the scale will be slightly less than when standing on both feet, but the difference is typically not significant for most people.
In PD the only correlated equilibrium is a Nash equilibrium. No strictly dominated strategy can be played in a correlated equilibrium
because if the cat will only stand with 3 or 1 foot/feet it may get out of balance and it may cause the injury of the cat
A system is said to be social equilibrium when there is a dynamic working balance among its interdependent parts (Davis & Newstrom, 1985). Each subsystem will adjust to any change in the other subsystems and will continue to do so until an equilibrium is retained. The process of achieving equilibrium will only work if the changes happen slowly, but for rapid changes it would throw the social system into chaos, unless and until a new equilibrium can be reached.From The Desk of Dr. Adnan Iqbal
No, a consumer does not need to purchase some quantity of each commodity to be in equilibrium. Consumer equilibrium occurs when a consumer maximizes their utility given their budget constraint, which can happen by consuming only one good or a combination of goods. The key is that the marginal utility per dollar spent on each good is equal, leading to an optimal allocation of resources. Thus, it is possible for a consumer to achieve equilibrium with a preference for only certain goods.