Wood that is damp tends to spark alot.
I have burned wood to heat my house for years, and am very familiar with wood types, and I have not found that answer to be correct. Certain types of wood just spark a lot, I don't know why. Hedge is the hottest burning wood I know of and is also the worst offender in the spark category. It seems that any yellow colored wood is a bad sparker, such as hedge (aka osage orange) and black locust and mulberry. They spark a lot, burn hot, and are yellow colored wood. The best overall wood is white oak, as it splits fairly easy, and burns really hot, but not too hot like hedge (it will melt your grates) has almost no sparks and lasts a long time.
For more details about many types of wood, click here: http://www.demesne.info/Garden-Help/Trees-Shrubs/Firewood-hard.htm
You probably scream a lot.
Plywood is typically made from pine products (and glue) that really can be bad for your fireplace. The tar builds up and can lead to what is called a "flue" fire. Flue fires have been responsible for starting fires and burning homes.
Abundance means that there is a lot of it, while scarcity means that there is very little. This applies to anything, not just wood.
Wood Stoves are not designed to burn wood all the efficiently and the coals you see are normal. There really isn't a lot you can do to improve the burning efficiency of your wood stove. If the stove is heating properly and you have a small amount of unburned charcoal, you are doing everything fine.
We work at a lab testing wood and charcoal burning stoves. Charcoal doesn't burn hotter than wood in a stove. That's why it's better for broiling not burning steaks. Charcoal is used in lots of places like African cities because it makes little smoke and keeps burning for a long time which is more convenient than wood that requires tending. Also charcoal can be made and sold by the rural poor to the urbanites who have more money. And charcoal is lighter than wood for transport. However, more than half of the energy in the wood is wasted when turning wood into charcoal! From an ecological perspective it's a lot better to burn wood cleanly. Charcoal is almost pure carbon ... no moisture, no extraneous chemicals. But don't forget, charcoal is a residue ... a lot of wood was burned to make it.
Johnny is in critical condition in the hospital with horrible burns on his body and he broke his back after a large burning timber fell on him while he was saving some kids in a burning church. He says he can't feel anything from the waist down. He broke his back after the piece of wood in the burning hit him. After the wood fell on him, he fell to the ground and got serious burns everywhere but mostly his neck and helost a lot of oxygen and blood and he was very close to dying.
Yes it does. Back when Brazil was a Portuguese colony, a big industry for the Portuguese was the extration of wood. Portugal won a lot of money with this extrative industry. Not any kind of wood though. In Brazil we have a typical wood that is red/yelow, looks like it's on fire. Just like burning coal. There is a name in Portuguese for "burning coal" that is "brasa". So, burning coal is "brasa". "Brasa" is a noun, the adjective for "like burning coal" is "brasil". Therefore the wood that was abundant here was named "Pau-Brasil" or Brazilwood (as there is no word in english for "LikeBurningCoal-Wood", or something like that...lol...). Brazilwood was very popular and used in europe, so the word was that a "Brazil land" was discovered.
Pine burns easily, but quickly. It can be good to get a fire started. It generates a lot of creosote, and the chimney will need cleaning more often.
Probably a lot like burning plastic.
Oak, ash, black locust, osage orange. Hickory is good but pops a lot. Poplar, cottonwood and any evergreen will burn VERY fast.
During combustion carbon dioxide and water are released; ash is only the residue.
They used wood for totem poles, utensils, longhouses, and canoes. They needed a lot of wood to build these items.