In order to be considered a planet, Pluto would have to clear its orbital path of debris. Pluto is not large enough to do this, so it was reclassified as a dwarf planet.
Well for pluto to be considored a planet it would need to… …straighten out its orbit because it intersects with Neptunes orbit …Become bigger …Be closer to the sun …Dominate its moon
Neptune. It would be Pluto, but Pluto is a dwarf planet ( a planet that was a planet, but decided that it wasn't a planet)
as the planet Pluto is considered the furthest planet from the sun, it would be a cold planet
Neptune. It would be Pluto, but Pluto is a dwarf planet ( a planet that was a planet, but decided that it wasn't a planet)
That would be Pluto, but Pluto is no longer considered a planet, only a planetoid.
In Kannada, we would say:Pluto Graha
Pluto.
That would be Neptune.
None. Old textbooks would say that it is Pluto, but Pluto is no longer considered a planet.
No. It is out of the question, as long as the current definition of planet prevails. In order to be a major planet (Pluto is a minor, or dwarf planet) it would have to clear a large area of the Kuiper Belt (the asteroid belt where Pluto spends most of its time) of any objects-- at least objects that are close to it in size and location. It's not likely that Pluto will ever do this. Pluto has that other oddity as well; it travels inside of Neptune's orbit for roughly 15 years out of every orbit. No other planet pair does this. There is no danger of Pluto crashing into Neptune, because Pluto and Neptune have an exact harmonic relationship. This includes the fact that for every 3 Neptunian orbits, Pluto makes 2. So some consider Pluto to be more like a moon of Neptune rather than a planet per se.
The closest planet to Pluto is Neptune, the closest object would be Chiron which is Pluto's "moon", although it is little more than a captured asteroid.
Plutos not a planet because is does not meet the necessary requirements to be a planet