in would kill us all because the wolrd woul crak
it means that either a nuclear rocket or a nuclear lab has exploded letting out nuclear waste and radiation which means the city would have to be evacuated until they are out of the nuclear radation zone.
After the impact BP's oil disaster had on local economy in the Gulf of Mexico, I would say environmental protections safeguard the economy.
The world's third largest economy would be the United States. (1st is the world, 2nd is the EU)
A few, yes, but Chernobyl was considered a dreafully designed nuclear power plant from the outset, and few plants would have imitated that design, especially after the disaster.
A tecnological disaster would be if the GPS sat's fell out of earths orbit, The internet going out globaly, or a sucurity system failing. Its a Disaster that relates to tecnology. Just like a Ecenomical disaster is the economy :L hope this helped
One bomb? Not much. Thousands of bombs? Severe disaster.
A accidental release. That would be a disaster. The thermal footprint that occurs due to the heat creation.
No, I don't think I would. The radiation after the nuclear bomb went off would be extraordinary, and after living in it, it would be a painful way to die. I think I would rather be at ground zero if the nuke was to go off. No muss, no fuss, and a quick death.
Probably these two reasons: 1) The cost of sending rockets constantly to the sun loaded with nuclear waste would bankrupt the industry. 2) A "misfire" (rocket that crashes) would be an environmental disaster.
in all likelihood no nuclear weapons will be used against Iran or Iraq. But if they were used it would cause the economy to shift into a war economy if the nations retaliated.
The economy? huh. If a war between the U.S. and Russia were to happen then there would be no economy left. Almost all of the Human population will be destroyed by the resulting nuclear war. Every economy will be wiped out.
It would be damaged so much as to be very hard to describe.