it would not be able to function
like store food and waste or energy
If you didn't have animal cells, you would not be able to form tissues, organs, or body systems. Animal cells are essential building blocks for living organisms to carry out processes like respiration, reproduction, and movement. Without animal cells, complex multicellular organisms like humans would not be able to exist.
the animal cells would eventually erode away as the pile got stronger and this would eventually kill living things if we end up without any cells
An animal cell is very important. Without cells, there would be no animals. Cells are what make up animals and all other living things.
Yes, they have a nucleus. Without a nucleus, cells wouldn't be able to function, and that means we wouldn't be able to function, which means all animals would be dead if their cells didn't have a nucleus. The only animal cell without a nucleus is the red blood cell.
No.
A polar bear has animal cells. Animal cells are the basic building blocks of most animals, including mammals like polar bears. Plant cells have different structures and functions compared to animal cells.
By not having a cell wall (cellulose) the animal cells are not rigid. When the cells are not rigid, they can move. If animal cells would have cells walls, animals wouldn't be able to move and be static as a plant. Also cells explode without cell wall. Actually plant cells do move...the roots move slowly down into the soil and the leaves move toward the light. Animal cells do not explode without a cell wall. They are stable enough with a few proteins and cholesterol in their membranes.
No all cells are different
All animals has to have animal cells. Otherwise, they wouldn't consider being animals. LOL
no
animal cells do not have chloroplasts
Plant cells have a large vacuole, which the animal cells don't.