Because, for whatever reason, they do not want that person on the jury.
It is called a PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE and is exercised during the Voir Dire portion of jury selection.
Absolutely not. HOWEVER - when selecting a jury panel - during Voire Dire, the attorneys questioning the prospective jurors MAY, for their own reasons, exercise a peremptory challenge against certain jurors they feel may be hostile to their case. They do NOT have to explain their reason why, but the sex of the juror could be a factor in a particular case.
An attorney can successfully exclude an individual from serving on the jury by using peremptory challenges or challenges for cause during jury selection. Peremptory challenges allow attorneys to dismiss potential jurors without providing a reason, while challenges for cause require a valid legal reason, such as bias or inability to be impartial. By strategically using these challenges, an attorney can exclude individuals they believe may be unfavorable to their case.
In most jurisdictions, during the voir dire part of the jury selection process, prospective jurors are asked if they know any of the persons involved in the lawsuit. That most often includes the plaintiff, defendant, judge, attorneys and witnesses. If they do, the judge will usually excuse them. This allows the attorneys to keep all of the challenges they are allowed to have. Then, the attorneys can challenge jurors for reasons other than relationship to the other people involved.
Both management and motivation are important during an earthquake response. Effective management ensures that resources are allocated efficiently and tasks are delegated appropriately, while motivation helps keep individuals focused, energized, and resilient during the crisis. Balancing both elements can help maximize the effectiveness of the overall response effort.
The reader understands the characters motivation
Answer this question… What was the Soviet Union's main motivation for providing military support to Egypt during the Suez Canal crisis?
Medical attorneys should first have a law degree and have passed the bar in their respective states. They should also have specialized in medical law during law school.
one of the most biggest challengings was fighting for what they wanted.
Military attorneys represented the prosecution attorneys. Judges were civil judges brought over by the US. They were not representing the US they were representing the Allied Nations. There were military and German attorneys for the German defense teams. The civilian judges came from many countries and they had military aides.
Used personal experience as motivation
Rodney King's attorneys were Steven Lerman and Robert Rentzer. They represented King during his civil lawsuit against the city of Los Angeles following the police beating that ignited the 1992 LA riots.