What would be an auto workers argument for tariffs on imported cars?

The national defense argument for tariffs on steel is based on the prospect of war or the need to prepare for one. Without tariffs on steel, such as the one imposed during the George W. Bush administration, steel would be easily imported and the nation would become dependent on these imports. By imposing a tariff, defense contractors as example, would already have established steel contracts from domestic producers. Hence, no problems regarding having enough steel.

Tariffs are defined as being taxes that are paid on imported goods. It was the southern states of the country that tended to oppose these tariffs. This is because they depended on many products that were imported from other areas of the country for their livelihood. However, while the southern states were the major suppliers of cotton and other such products they would have spent out more on tariffs than they received back.

Australians disliked Asian workers because they were energetic and competitive. This led to wish that they be excluded from the work force as the average Auzy could not compete. Being bad workers put them in a position where they were not able to compete with imports so tariffs were put on imported goods that would make it easier for Australians to compete. Australia never actually had a white Australia policy they did not have the… Read More

yes they did

In certain situations, throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, tariffs have always been a subject of nations' economic progress. Tariffs area tax on imported products and the US government has control over tariffs. When tariffs are abused it forces consumers to pay more for imported goods. This often times helps domestic companies which because of tariffs forces people to buy from them.There was a period of time in 19th century US, where the Southern populations… Read More

The tariffs taxed imported products so that people would be more willing to buy the cheaper goods made in America. Therefore, the new businesses in America, would not have to compete with more experienced factories in Europe.

Tariffs are fees placed on imported goods. This fee raises the price of such goods and makes domestic goods more competitive in regards to price. A high tariff accentuates the effect. The tariff also tends to reduce the quantity of imported goods and affects the balance of trade. Whether or not such tariffs are helpful to America depends on conditions. Tariffs do raise money for the government but foreign governments can impose tariffs too and… Read More

Such tariffs are commonly used to protect a country's local production or manufacture; so in this case that would be to protect its local agricultural production.

Industries in the country would develop and become more competitive with foreign industries.

There are pluses and minuses in using tariffs for revenue to operate the government. Firstly, tariffs would not be enough to cover the cost of running a government in most cases. Secondly, if Country A places tariffs on goods being imported into their country, then all other Countries will also place such tariffs on goods imported into their Countries from Country A. These costs will of course be passed on to the purchasers of these… Read More

Tariffs, which were taxes on imported goods. The north favored them because they protected their factories from foreign competition. However, the south feared that Britain, who bought a lot of their cotton, would stop buying it. Also, the tariffs caused the cost of goods to rise.

Overall, high tariffs would no doubt hurt America . Tariffs can produce revenue. Also, by raising the cost of imported goods, they increase the demand for American products which may benefit the domestic economy. However, if America puts tariffs into place, foreign countries would most likely retaliate by putting tariffs on American products thereby reducing exports and harming producers of exported products . Also, there may not be an adequate domestic source for some of… Read More

Advantages: Tarrifs reduce international competition against small firms, businesses and workers in the country where tariffs are placed on imports, so those small firms can stay and provide jobs and incomes for the country's citizens Balance of trade deficit is made less prominent Prices of imports become expensive so people would opt for local goods Tariffs are a kind of tax, so it is still a source of income for the government Disadvantages: The countries… Read More

Hamilton planned to protect the US merchants by imposing high tariffs on imported goods. This in turned would cause Americans to buy goods made in the US.

Some countries run systems where labor costs are very low, which means some goods can be made very cheaply. So developed nations have to impose tariffs or otherwise their own workers would be unemployed.

Congress wanted to raise the tariff on imports from Europe so that it would help the North compete. South Carolina then passed the Nullification Act saying they would not pay the tariffs and deemed them to be illegal.

If the question refers to the tariff acts of the early 1800's in the United States, then the answer is Southern politicians and plantation owners. The Northern manufacturing sector of the USA wanted to curtail imported products by having tariffs on these products, giving USA companies a competitive advantage over foreign goods. Although the South did buy Northern products, it also bought imported ones. This meant they had to pay more for imported goods. In… Read More

The Confederacy believed that Great Britain would intervene via "peace talks" to benefit the South. Confederate leaders believed that cotton was a bargaining chip to be used. It was a valid argument. Great Britain's cotton supply came via the South and 75% of its imported cotton was from the Confederacy. Also, the textile mills in England employed 20% of English workers.

Tariffs are forms of proctectionism or trade barriers. By imposing tariffs, it can affect the market for bananas in EU and also the country which it imports from. From my understanding, there can be many effects from the tariffs and it can be analysed from a very complicated perspective using graphs. Generally, the buyers in EU will face a higher price of imported bananas, while the sellers in EU can benefit from the tariff, as… Read More

This question is incredibly overbroad. There are so many laws across different places and times that regulate or require tariffs that it would be impossible to answer. (The United States has over 300 such laws currently in effect.)

tariffs would make more money for gov program

No the President can not set tariffs. Tariffs would require a bill to be passed which can only be done by the Congress.

It would not be economically friendly for the united states since over 50% of our imported products are made in china. If the government would impose taxes on Chinese goods you could see and increase in almost every single product you see in a store.

Tariffs are taxes on imported goods. They only reason for tariffs is to make the imports more expensive than your own products. For example, if Germany's automobile business was losing business because more Germans were buying African cars than German ones, Germany would place a tariff on African cars that are being imported to Germany. This would make African countries have to raise their car prices in Germany in order to make profit (as they… Read More

Tariffs would prevent competition from farmers abroad.

Tariffs are taxes on imported or exported goods. They are usually placed on imported items to make these items more expensive than products made in the country, so consumers would buy homemade materials. For example, if all of a sudden more Brazilians started buying more American cars, Brazil might place a tariff on American cars, which would make the price of Brazilian cars less expensive to appease to consumers.

Because Lincoln represented the Republicans, a party that would not allow new slave-states. This meant that the South would be increasingly out-voted in Congress, which would be tempted to levy more tariffs on the imported goods the South needed, having almost no manufacturing industry of their own.

Why would they not be? If you use the argument that NASCAR is for U.S manufacturers then you have no idea where Toyotas are built. Very few models are built and imported from Japan. Most are built in the U.S. where the have plants in Mississippi, Kentucky, Texas and Indiana.

Henry Parkes was very much in favour of federation of the Australian colonies. His main argument was that it would benefit trade by removing tariffs at the borders between the colonies. This would be particularly beneficial for settlements in northern New South Wales which were better off trading with settlements in southern Queensland rather than within their own state. The problem was that heavy tariffs greatly impeded free trade across the borders.

That if tariffs were lowered the pressure of foreign companies out selling them would make them get better products for lower prices.

Why did farmers oppose tariffs? Tarrifs would raise the proces for their goods & they worried that they would not make as much profit. By Kenny A.

Privatizing Social Security would put younger workers at the mercy of fluctuating stock market returns

Privatizing Social Security would put younger workers at the mercy of fluctuating stock market returns

make American industry more efficient.

Make American industry more efficient.

Make your question more clear. What tariffs and when? If you did not answer your own question, someone would get a right one to you.

It would increase the demand for American manufactured goods. Tariffs would also increase the money generated by the sale of those goods.

Free soil - so that the South would continue to be outnumbered and outvoted in Congress, and the North could continue to protect their manufacturing industry by raising tariffs on imported goods, which were needed by the South much more than the North.

O2 tariffs are paid by users or customers on the O2 network. An American would pay tariffs through their service provider and would incur any roaming charges if their plan did not cover it through them rather than O2.

It would raise prices.

Yes, he actually proposed high protective tariffs. He believed they would encourage domestic growth and industry.

Grover Cleveland wanted to lower tariffs rate but congress would not support or help him. Meanwhile Benjamin Harrison wanted tariffs even higher and he signed the McKinley Tariff Act of 1890,which raised tariffs on manufactured goods to their highest level yet.

The modern Republican party would generally favor lowering tariffs, encouraging open trade among countries. High tariffs are seen by Democrats as a way to protect domestic jobs.

The slave states hated the tariffs more than other states because slaves could have tariffs on their lives. A slave that originally sold for 100 gold would sell for up to 150 with the tax.

Slaves were imported into every colony in what would become the United States.

There are many situations that would encourage the European Union to put tariffs on imports. A good example is when the imports pose a threat to the local productions.

This included Immediate Tariff Cuts, which would phase out tariffs in eight areas including the jewelry industry. Dropping these tariffs would create new opportunities for growth.

No, arguments can either be strong or weak, however, a valid argument would be considered a sound argument. The opposite would be an invalid argument.

It would raise agricultural prices on farmers

Ultimately, it wouldn't. The US needs to have access to Global Markets to sell its products and services. imposing tariffs on imported goods may help American manufacturers in the short term, but reprisals from the other major trading blocs (EU, China etc) would be swift. It's been tried in the past and let to the great depression of the 1930's.